🚀 go-pugleaf

"p_j" <p_j@postzzzmark.net> wrote in message
news:1gim0yy.1asnenfbthnhcN%p_j@postzzzmark.net...

> > > >     No actually it was a claim of a feminist.

> C'mon fat boy. Don't run from this one.

    Why shout *I* run from it Mr. BELL AND HOWELL HELICOPTERS/.

> >     It was yours. I am amazed how in ONE message you ATTACK and claim
the
> > Bell helicopters with SPRAYERS in one post and then in another claim I
made
> > it up. Tell me, do you think people FORGET from one message to the nest?
> > REALLY?

> Gosh, you forgot about your invention of the secret base and the
> personal delivery. How easy you shift back and forth. Do you think it is
> unreasonable to wonder if someone so thoroughly dishonest and who is
> involved with pedophilia and rape, might actually have personal
> involvement in them?

    Well which is it??? MILLIONS of Bell and Howell ATTACK helicopters with
their 16mm cannons blazing or not?  You angrily argue they exist and one
post then angrily claim I made it up the next. Can YOU remember nutso?

> > > Well, c'mon kookla, you've been married a bunch of times (the story
> > > changes), you've been accused of child abuse and spousal rape, you
make
> > > a living helping accused pedophiles and rapists, you are a notorious
> > > internet troll and go to extremes to shill for Bush.

> >     Nope 3 times. Today that's not many, in "No-Fault" states. But then
even
> > in a "FAULT" state I'd have gotten a divorce twice. That's why I WON.

> But that doesn't adress the accusations of spousal rape and sexual
> involvement with your young daughters.

    The accusations of spousal rape and my children comes from YOU Mr.
PSYCHO and David Moore. It has ZERO basis in reality, and again, you would
only say this in the safety of anonymity on the internet, you'd never had
the guts to say it to my face. NO, TWERP, I am not getting on an airpolane
to meet a PHANTOM SISSY!!

> > They got ZERO weapons of ANY kind from us. Even HARRY had
> > to back off that claim.

> No chem weapons, no bio weapons precursors and technoloy, no dual-use
> technology, no targeting information from satellite data?

    READ MY LIPS BUTTLICK....... The CDC gave Iraq some Anthrax for what
Iraq claimed was development of an anti-toxin. And DIPSHIT wqhiloe you foam
at the mouth, while Iraq DID in fact use chemical and biological weapons,
they DID NOT use Anthrax, SO DIPSHIT, your STUPID claims go nowhere. NO we
NEVER sold them any HELICOPTERS of ANY type. I know you keep ranting and
raving we did.. BUT, nobody credible supports youir INSANE claims. NOBODY
looney tunes NOBODY!

> Gosh, the world is confused.

    Nope just people listening to YOU dingbat!

> >     Okay they got SOME sattelite photos.

> Ahhhhhhh, another victory. Of course they got much more than satellite
> photos, they got daily targeting information.


    Oh BULLSHIT. I admitted they got SOME 3 years ago. DAILY? You are
PSYCHO................ Why do you just make this kind of shit up? Do you
think people will believe you?

> Sure. In fact that CIA believes that the Halbja residents died from
> Iranian gas. Hell, we gave them TOW missiles. Of course, the traitors
> like Powell testified under oath that they couldn't remember doing that.

HEY ASSWIPE...... Next you are going to claim we gave them Patriot missiles.
We did NOT given them TOW missiles or any other missiles. You are so STUPID
man it is incredible.  Jesus you make shit up like wild. Do you know WHAT a
TOW missile IS jerkoff?? Do you have ANY idea? WHAT are they launched from?
Your problem is that you start BULLSHITTING without any knowledge of the
subject you are bullshitting about. You just WHOLESALE make this shit up. Do
you have ANY idea HOW a TOW missile is launched? I mean ANY?????? Have you
ever seen one? I guess them mounted them on thos eBELL AND HOWELL attack
helicopters right next to the 16mm cannons...........  Change your name to
"FRUIT LOOP!"



> > > >    Might want to look at the membership rolls of the Milwaukee
County party
> > > > from when I lived there.

> > > Yeah, that'd be easy.

> >     Actually it WOULD.

> (It's not.)

    Not if they wouldn't allow you through the front door, and THAT I could
fully understand! If I was woorking there *I* sure as hell wouldn't let YOU
in!


> > > Hey, just wondering how you come up with your explanation that most
> > > claims of rape are fake. If you don't want to reveal the thinking
behind
> > > that, I guess it shows some sense on your part.
> >
> >     When did I say THAT?

> You said something like that just a couple posts ago. You didn't "buy"
> the claims of rape.

    Are you NUTS? Get better glasses buttlick.

> > I have said that there are MANY false rape claims.

> Are there?

    Yes according to several studies, like the University of Utah,
Department of Defense and others.

> > I have said that according to some studies almost half are false.

> Interesting.

    I thought so when I read them.

> > I did NOT say I endorsed those studies. I have and will say again that
when feminists
> > claim that only 2% are false, they are LYING...

> Are there studies to support that or is that your "feeling."

    Yeah bub, there are several studies. Go look them up for yourself.

> > That does NOT mean that I am
> > saying that they all are false or that most are false, except in a
DISEASED
> > brain like yours. SOME are false, many more than 2%... Can you prove
> > otherwise?

> I think you should prove your assertion. First time for everything.

    I know, to you this is all come contest.  Prove me wrong.