🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <20010107070805.14919.qmail@nym.alias.net>,
  Irmin <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
> Jewish Hypocrisy and Israel
>
> At all costs, Israel must stay Jewish, say the Jews. Thus,
> Israel's racist Law of Return applies only to Jews. Arafat thinks
> it should apply to the descendants of the Arabs dispossessed and
> driven from their homes by Jewish terrorists in the founding of
> Israel. Jewish racists like the writer here don't like that idea.
> Rather, they only like that idea applied to your country. These
> Jewish racists denounce you the American for wanting to keep your
> country White and civilized. They push legislation such as the
> 1965 Immigration Act that opens the gates to the Third World,
> destroying our physical stock and cultural integrity -- but
> advancing their interests. Yet another reason Jews are the enemy.
>
> --VNN <http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com>
>
You are correct in that organized Jewry is a very loud voice in
promoting Third World immigration to America. Any comments as to why>

Sepp

> ====
>
> Thursday, January 4, 2001
>
> The 'Right of Return' Dashes All Hope
>
> By YOSSI KLEIN HALEVI
>
> JERUSALEM--Yasser Arafat's refusal to abandon the "right of
> return" of several million Palestinian refugees to Israel proper
> belies his tentative acceptance of President Clinton's final
> Middle East peace proposal.
>
> The Oslo peace process was based on the assumption that, at the
> moment of truth, Arafat would sacrifice the dream of displacing
> the Jewish state with Greater Palestine in exchange for a more
> modest Palestinian state alongside Israel. But by insisting on
> the right of return -- even after the Barak government has
> accepted almost total withdrawal [largely fictional --Irmin] into
> the 1967 lines and Palestinian sovereignty in East Jerusalem --
> the Palestinian leadership has proved that its recognition of
> Israel's legitimacy has been merely tactical all along.
>
> The right of return is a euphemism for the destruction of Israel
> through demographic assault: Overwhelmed with bitter Palestinian
> refugees raised on hatred, the Jewish state would implode.
> Arafat's peace offer, then, is predicated on Israel's agreement
> to self-destruct.
>
> By entrusting the peace process to the Palestine Liberation
> Organization, the architects of the Oslo accords ensured their
> ultimate failure. That is because the PLO -- which was founded in
> 1964, three years before the West Bank and Gaza fell into Israeli
> hands -- has always represented the refugees of 1948. Arafat
> cannot abandon the right of return because he has built his whole
> career on its fulfillment.
>
> Even left-wing Israelis are horrified by the right of return. In
> an anguished open letter to the Palestinian leadership, 33 of
> Israel's most prominent doves recently wrote: "The meaning of
> such a return would be the elimination of the state of Israel.
> Massive return of the Palestinian refugees to Israel would
> conflict with the right to self-determination of the Jewish
> people."
>
> Indeed, the right of return -- not to a new Palestinian state but
> to Israel -- negates the the logic of a two-state solution, in
> which each state is empowered to bring its diaspora home. A
> Palestinian return to Israeli territory would mean that Israel
> would become a binational Arab-Jewish state, even as an
> exclusively Arab-Palestinian state, emptied of [illegal] Jewish
> settlers, emerges next door. The symbolic meaning of the return
> is no less significant than its practical implications. The
> Palestinian leadership insists on Israeli admission of exclusive
> responsibility for the creation of the refugee problem. That, of
> course, would ignore the real tragedy of the Middle East
> conflict, which is the story of two traumatized peoples clinging
> to the same patch of land.
>
> [...]
>
> There was a time when the Israelis tried to exclusively
> appropriate justice for their side and denied the Palestinian
> narrative. Today, though, only a die-hard minority insists the
> Palestinians have no case. True, half a century of sovereignty
> has allowed Israel to mature, while the Palestinian community
> remains at an earlier stage of national development, still
> struggling for statehood. Yet Palestinian self-pity has now
> become the greatest obstacle to achieving statehood. And those
> offering uncritical sympathy to the Palestinians are
> inadvertently reinforcing their self-destructive victim complex.
>
> Friends of the Palestinians should ask them this question: Do you
> want a state that will alleviate your people's suffering, or is
> your real goal the destruction of Israel?
>
> Yossi Klein Halevi Is the Israel Correspondent for the New
> Republic and a Senior Writer for the Jerusalem Report
>
> Copyright 2000 Los Angeles Times
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
> "A people who are not convinced of their uniqueness and value
> will perish." (David Lane)
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
> Fourteen Word Press
> http://www.14words.com
>
> National Alliance
> http://www.natvan.com
>
> Racial Nationalist Library
> http://members.netnormal.com/library
>
> Stormfront
> http://www.stormfront.org
>
> Vanguard News Network
> http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com
>
> Yggdrasil's Library
> http://www.ddc.net/ygg
>
>


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/