🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: milw.general
Article #443

Re: Evolution weeds out fat gene by making it difficult for fat people to have sex?

#443
From: jay_stutz
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:53
58 lines
4399 bytes

The Daily Rant wrote:
> Obesity No Good for Sex by
> http://www.pervscan.com/2004/11/28/obesity-no-good-for-sex/
>
> "New research confirms the worst fears of those who worry about
> putting on extra pounds: Severely overweight people are much more
> likely to report poor sex lives. In some areas of their sex lives, the
> obese report 25 times as many problems as people of weight levels
> considered healthy. Both obese men and women suffered from lack of
> sexual desire and enjoyment along with hampered performance. Many obese
> reported avoiding sex entirely. The study results suggest that many fat
> people share similar challenges on the sexual level.
>
> Confess! You know you've thought this before. You've been walking
> on the street or strolling along in a shopping mall. Suddenly you see
> two people - a man and a woman - but, you think, they're less a
> couple than a triple or a quadruple. "Watch out," you smirk.
> "Wide load!" And then that dirty little thought creeps through your
> head. You watch them waddle by and you think: How do they do it?
>
> Even supposing that they find each other appealing - and you're not
> sure how they can find such mountains of flesh attractive - how do
> they physically manage the act of fucking? Good God, they look like
> Weebles! Don't their enormous bellies prevent any approach from the
> front? How can any penis be long enough to extend past that man's
> enormous gut and find its way through those folds of fat to that
> woman's hole? And even supposing that they manage to connect somehow,
> they're so flabby and out of shape that it's hard to imagine them
> sustaining an act of passionate lovemaking. Don't they wheeze? Run
> out of breath? Don't they risk massive coronaries?
>
> It seems self-evident that fat people would have unsatisfactory sex
> lives. But at the same time, you can draw some pretty weird conclusions
> from this. For example: is allowing yourself to become fat a sign of
> contempt for sex? That's weird, because sex is so intrinsically
> appealing that it's hard to imagine why people would have such
> contempt for it. Wouldn't the prospect of better orgasms encourage
> people to go to the gym? Wouldn't you rather have a good lay than
> another piece of cake?
>
> But obesity, some will retort, is not a matter of having a weak will.
> It's a psychopathology. It's a disease. It's genetic... And yet,
> if that's the case, then an even weirder conclusion ensues. If it's
> a pathology of any sort, does that mean that sexual problems are
> nature's way of trying to suppress it? Does evolution try to weed out
> the fat gene by making it difficult for fat people to fuck?
>
> http://www.pervscan.com/2004/11/28/obesity-no-good-for-sex/

Birth rates should be plummenting in the upper midwest. Hmong, negro,
and spic birthrates remain obscene and will remain high until folks
refuse tax monies for their rodent-like breeding habits.

Jay

Jay
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1122501195.102849.64510@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <1122388614.848447.217050@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fcd36,57e652a63fb35a09,start
X-Google-Thread: fa03c,57e652a63fb35a09,start
X-Google-Thread: fda71,57e652a63fb35a09,start
X-Google-Thread: f765b,57e652a63fb35a09,start
X-Google-Thread: 10e835,57e652a63fb35a09,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidfcd36,gidfa03c,gidfda71,gidf765b,gid10e835,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: jay_stutz@yahoo.com
Newsgroups: milw.general,wi.general,ia.talk.misc,mn.general,chi.general
Subject: Re: Evolution weeds out fat gene by making it difficult for fat people to have sex?
Date: 27 Jul 2005 14:53:15 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 59
Message-ID: <1122501195.102849.64510@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
References: <1122388614.848447.217050@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.42.85.175
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1122501200 24530 127.0.0.1 (27 Jul 2005 21:53:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:53:20 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1122388614.848447.217050@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=162.42.85.175;
   posting-account=dOCG-A0AAAAHld3fkab_iD9VCLr-yPXR