Article View: milw.general
Article #443Re: Evolution weeds out fat gene by making it difficult for fat people to have sex?
From: jay_stutz
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:53
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:53
58 lines
4399 bytes
4399 bytes
The Daily Rant wrote: > Obesity No Good for Sex by > http://www.pervscan.com/2004/11/28/obesity-no-good-for-sex/ > > "New research confirms the worst fears of those who worry about > putting on extra pounds: Severely overweight people are much more > likely to report poor sex lives. In some areas of their sex lives, the > obese report 25 times as many problems as people of weight levels > considered healthy. Both obese men and women suffered from lack of > sexual desire and enjoyment along with hampered performance. Many obese > reported avoiding sex entirely. The study results suggest that many fat > people share similar challenges on the sexual level. > > Confess! You know you've thought this before. You've been walking > on the street or strolling along in a shopping mall. Suddenly you see > two people - a man and a woman - but, you think, they're less a > couple than a triple or a quadruple. "Watch out," you smirk. > "Wide load!" And then that dirty little thought creeps through your > head. You watch them waddle by and you think: How do they do it? > > Even supposing that they find each other appealing - and you're not > sure how they can find such mountains of flesh attractive - how do > they physically manage the act of fucking? Good God, they look like > Weebles! Don't their enormous bellies prevent any approach from the > front? How can any penis be long enough to extend past that man's > enormous gut and find its way through those folds of fat to that > woman's hole? And even supposing that they manage to connect somehow, > they're so flabby and out of shape that it's hard to imagine them > sustaining an act of passionate lovemaking. Don't they wheeze? Run > out of breath? Don't they risk massive coronaries? > > It seems self-evident that fat people would have unsatisfactory sex > lives. But at the same time, you can draw some pretty weird conclusions > from this. For example: is allowing yourself to become fat a sign of > contempt for sex? That's weird, because sex is so intrinsically > appealing that it's hard to imagine why people would have such > contempt for it. Wouldn't the prospect of better orgasms encourage > people to go to the gym? Wouldn't you rather have a good lay than > another piece of cake? > > But obesity, some will retort, is not a matter of having a weak will. > It's a psychopathology. It's a disease. It's genetic... And yet, > if that's the case, then an even weirder conclusion ensues. If it's > a pathology of any sort, does that mean that sexual problems are > nature's way of trying to suppress it? Does evolution try to weed out > the fat gene by making it difficult for fat people to fuck? > > http://www.pervscan.com/2004/11/28/obesity-no-good-for-sex/ Birth rates should be plummenting in the upper midwest. Hmong, negro, and spic birthrates remain obscene and will remain high until folks refuse tax monies for their rodent-like breeding habits. Jay Jay
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1122501195.102849.64510@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1122388614.848447.217050@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fcd36,57e652a63fb35a09,start X-Google-Thread: fa03c,57e652a63fb35a09,start X-Google-Thread: fda71,57e652a63fb35a09,start X-Google-Thread: f765b,57e652a63fb35a09,start X-Google-Thread: 10e835,57e652a63fb35a09,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfcd36,gidfa03c,gidfda71,gidf765b,gid10e835,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: jay_stutz@yahoo.com Newsgroups: milw.general,wi.general,ia.talk.misc,mn.general,chi.general Subject: Re: Evolution weeds out fat gene by making it difficult for fat people to have sex? Date: 27 Jul 2005 14:53:15 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 59 Message-ID: <1122501195.102849.64510@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> References: <1122388614.848447.217050@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.42.85.175 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1122501200 24530 127.0.0.1 (27 Jul 2005 21:53:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:53:20 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1122388614.848447.217050@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/0.2 Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=162.42.85.175; posting-account=dOCG-A0AAAAHld3fkab_iD9VCLr-yPXR