🚀 go-pugleaf

kenpangborn@aol.com (Kenpangborn) wrote in message news:<20030707095731.20941.00000377@mb-m05.aol.com>...
> >From: jpyoung@io.com  (J. P. Young)
> >Newsgroups: milw.general
> 
> Gomer Moore said:
> 
> >1) Your article is from April 9th. My calendar reads July 6th. Almost
> >three months have passed since this preliminary field report.
> 
> Oh so that means it wasn't radioactive?


 The site was a nuclear power plant you moron. The US knew about it
since the early 80's.


> 
> >2) Since this article first came out, the US military has had plenty
> >of time to get have their top experts examine this site. 
> 
> They took samples back to the US for lab testing. Last I saw the results had
> not been commented on. There are several possibilities of why. We could take
> YOURS that it was merely silly putty. Or we could take a different view that
> there are reasons for "intelligence" issues that they don't comment on it. 
> 
>    There hasn't been a story on jessica Lynch in the past month, using YOUR
> logic Gomer, that means she never existed!


There were stories about Jessica Lynch on June 25. Today is July 7. Is
that a month in Looney Time from your special planet?  The story is
still in the news but the story you are spreading around thick as shit
is a lie. The invading forces went into what was the nuclear power
plant looking for WMD and didn't find any.  They left the place open
and now the surrounding villages are contaminated. An embedded US
correspondent with the marines at the site reported that US officers
broke through steel the doors sealed by the International Atomic
Energy Agency and found hundreds of sealed steel drums containing
low-enriched uranium, highly radioactive isotopes, and yellowcake raw
uranium. US and British troops didn't perform any decontamination to
the area that they exposed. The radiation seeped into the water
system. People are dying. The US and England are turning their backs
on the problem. The radioactive material was uranium used to generate
nuclear power and the plant supplied electricity to all of Southern
Iraq.


> 
>  >You would think that, under those circumstances,
> >that if there was a possible find of weapons grade plutonium, that the
> >army would be able to turn it into a confirmed report in a matter of
> >days or possibly 2-3 weeks, not months. 
> 
> Un;ess there are other reasons why they wouldn't.

  The other reason is that they didn't find weapons grade plutonium
there.



 Oh here one ONE Mooreon to
> chew on. WHAT IF among the things found they got documents showing that a bomb
> was completed and shipped to the US to be detonated by a cell? How smart would
> it be to let on we know before the Feds capture the bomb? Oh and how GREAT
> would it be to get a NEWS ALERT that "Iraq Built Bombs, now in hands of
> terrorist cells somewhere IN America!" 

  Tell your doctor to cut back on your medication. Someone has just
sited you tripping over a cordless phone. Better not sit down: They
say that brain damage is irreversible.

 
> 
> AM I saying that is what happened? I am only offering ONE alternate conclusion
> why some things may not have been reported as you like.

  Do you also attend the Star Trek convention? Your train of thought
derailed a long time ago.


> 
> >Also, if there was such a find, CentCom, the Bush administration, and the
> press would be reporting it as quickly as they ate up this initial report from
> a single embedded reporter.

  Now you are saying "if" there was such a find?   Your usenet history
has you spouting off at the mouth about there being confirmed reports
of weapons-grade plutonium.  Hedging are we?


>  
> >removed barrels that previously contained yellowcake 
> 
> While yellowcake IS radioactive it is NOT "highly radioactive" nor is
> yellowcake capable of sending a military radiation country off the scale even
> LOTS of it!

  You are the single dumbest person ever to post on usenet. You are
off the scale on the idiot meter. That is the most idiotic declaration
ever made by anyone, anywhere at any time, liar.