🚀 go-pugleaf

"Terri Madison" <karcher*XXV*@hushmail.com> wrote in message news:<1464dcfd0574c71a5d61e080e4879b14@remailer.frell.eu.org>...
> robgautier@DCEmail.com (Robert Gautier) wrote:
> >karcher*XXV*@hushmail.com ("Terri Madison") wrote in message
> >news:<fcc8056a57543315e8bd9f8437bd387c@remailer.frell.eu.org>...
> >> 
> >> Nor does his repeated remailer flooding of *my* mailbox (followed
> >> immediately by his showing up five minutes later, usually from the same
> >> remailer service, insisting that it's "Moore.")
> >> 
> >> LOL--I did notice that although he's done a lot of ranting in here today,
> >> he somehow skipped my post.  I s'pose he still has a bitter taste in his
> >> mouth from the thrashing I gave him last time.  :)
> >> 
> >> I'm still awaiting the official word from Google support, regarding the
> >> matter of posts being "brought back."  It should be interesting to see
> >> whether or not they ever said that--but will anyone *really* be surprised
> >> if Kenny is exposed as a liar again?
> >> 
> >> Terri
> >
> >
> > Kato Pangborn is still waiting for the spotlight.
> 
> Hello--
> 
> He's definitely got it.  Checked my e-mail this morning--lo and behold, had
> a response to the question I posed to Google support!
> 
> Return-Path: <cyrus@imap1.hushmail.com> 
> Received: from imap1.hushmail.com ([unix socket]) 
> by imap1.hushmail.com (Cyrus v2.0.17); Tue, 01 Jul 2003 17:14:13 -0700 
> X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0 
> Return-Path: <bounce-20-2769550@google.trakken.com> 
> Received: from smtp4.hushmail.com (smtp4.hushmail.com [65.39.178.34]) 
> by imap1.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45FBD4B827C 
> for <karcher25_40hushmail_2ecom@imap1.hushmail.com>; Tue, 1 Jul 2003
> 17:14:13 -0700 (PDT) 
> Received: from c2.neotonic.com (216-239-45-36.google.com [216.239.45.36]) 
> by smtp4.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E94CC61D7E 
> for <karcher25@hushmail.com>; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 17:14:13 -0700 (PDT) 
> Received: by c2.neotonic.com (Postfix, from userid 5701) 
> id F089BBBF9; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 17:14:13 -0700 (PDT) 
> Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 17:14:13 -0700 
> From: "The Google Team" <groups-support@google.com> 
> To: karcher25@hushmail.com 
> Subject: Re: [#2769550] Question about my privacy on Google Groups/Deja 
> Message-ID: <#14.2a428e.efd7c1ac.3f0223d5.3@google.trakken.com> 
> MIME-Version: 1.0 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" 
> In-Reply-To: <200306301642.h5UGgOuu065806@mailserver2.hushmail.com> 
> User-Agent: Neotonic Trakken/2.3.7 
> 
> Hi, 
> 
> This is not the case. Google respects the privacy of those who do not
> desire to have their messages archives.  Have you tried doing a search on
> your email address in the author search field to see? 
> 
> Sincerely, 
> 
> The Google Groups Team 
> 
> ************************************************************************ 
> 
> 
> Original Message Follows: 
> ------------------------ 
> From: <karcher25@hushmail.com> 
> Subject: Question about my privacy on Google Groups/Deja 
> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 09:42:23 -0700 
> 
> 
> Hello-- 
> 
> Several years ago, while the usenet archives were still being handled 
> by Dejanews/Deja, I used the "nuke" feature to remove several of my posts. 
> I did this because I had a stalker who was profiling me through my 
> posting history. 
> 
> Recently I was told that when Google took over the usenet archives, you 
> promised to "bring back" all of the postings which had been "nuked" under 
> Dejanews. As far as I can tell, my posts are not there--however, this 
> is a serious safety and privacy issue for me, and if you are indeed 
> planning to "un-nuke" these posts, I must strongly object. 
> 
> Would you clarify this matter, please? 
> 
> Sincerely, 
> 
> Terri Karcher 
> 
> 
> 
> So--there we have it.  "This is not the case" according to Google support.
> Wonder who Kenny talked to when he got his information?
> 
> *standing back, waiting for the usual name-calling, references to my
> participation in erotic literature, etc. to deflect attention from being
> caught in a lie*
> 
> Terri


   10
    9
    8
    7
    6...

    Congratulations Terri. Your prediction corresponds with real life
Pangborn. He skipped one post then called you "spazz". I suppose it
was his hope that we would forget his anonymous spamming of APAS and
his self attacks through remailers that are as transparent as the rest
of his lies.