🚀 go-pugleaf

robgautier@DCEmail.com (Robert Gautier) wrote:
>karcher*XXV*@hushmail.com ("Terri Madison") wrote in message
>news:<fcc8056a57543315e8bd9f8437bd387c@remailer.frell.eu.org>...
>> 
>> Nor does his repeated remailer flooding of *my* mailbox (followed
>> immediately by his showing up five minutes later, usually from the same
>> remailer service, insisting that it's "Moore.")
>> 
>> LOL--I did notice that although he's done a lot of ranting in here today,
>> he somehow skipped my post.  I s'pose he still has a bitter taste in his
>> mouth from the thrashing I gave him last time.  :)
>> 
>> I'm still awaiting the official word from Google support, regarding the
>> matter of posts being "brought back."  It should be interesting to see
>> whether or not they ever said that--but will anyone *really* be surprised
>> if Kenny is exposed as a liar again?
>> 
>> Terri
>
>
> Kato Pangborn is still waiting for the spotlight.

Hello--

He's definitely got it.  Checked my e-mail this morning--lo and behold, had
a response to the question I posed to Google support!

Return-Path: <cyrus@imap1.hushmail.com> 
Received: from imap1.hushmail.com ([unix socket]) 
by imap1.hushmail.com (Cyrus v2.0.17); Tue, 01 Jul 2003 17:14:13 -0700 
X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0 
Return-Path: <bounce-20-2769550@google.trakken.com> 
Received: from smtp4.hushmail.com (smtp4.hushmail.com [65.39.178.34]) 
by imap1.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45FBD4B827C 
for <karcher25_40hushmail_2ecom@imap1.hushmail.com>; Tue, 1 Jul 2003
17:14:13 -0700 (PDT) 
Received: from c2.neotonic.com (216-239-45-36.google.com [216.239.45.36]) 
by smtp4.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E94CC61D7E 
for <karcher25@hushmail.com>; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 17:14:13 -0700 (PDT) 
Received: by c2.neotonic.com (Postfix, from userid 5701) 
id F089BBBF9; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 17:14:13 -0700 (PDT) 
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 17:14:13 -0700 
From: "The Google Team" <groups-support@google.com> 
To: karcher25@hushmail.com 
Subject: Re: [#2769550] Question about my privacy on Google Groups/Deja 
Message-ID: <#14.2a428e.efd7c1ac.3f0223d5.3@google.trakken.com> 
MIME-Version: 1.0 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" 
In-Reply-To: <200306301642.h5UGgOuu065806@mailserver2.hushmail.com> 
User-Agent: Neotonic Trakken/2.3.7 

Hi, 

This is not the case. Google respects the privacy of those who do not
desire to have their messages archives.  Have you tried doing a search on
your email address in the author search field to see? 

Sincerely, 

The Google Groups Team 

************************************************************************ 


Original Message Follows: 
------------------------ 
From: <karcher25@hushmail.com> 
Subject: Question about my privacy on Google Groups/Deja 
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 09:42:23 -0700 


Hello-- 

Several years ago, while the usenet archives were still being handled 
by Dejanews/Deja, I used the "nuke" feature to remove several of my posts. 
I did this because I had a stalker who was profiling me through my 
posting history. 

Recently I was told that when Google took over the usenet archives, you 
promised to "bring back" all of the postings which had been "nuked" under 
Dejanews. As far as I can tell, my posts are not there--however, this 
is a serious safety and privacy issue for me, and if you are indeed 
planning to "un-nuke" these posts, I must strongly object. 

Would you clarify this matter, please? 

Sincerely, 

Terri Karcher 



So--there we have it.  "This is not the case" according to Google support.
Wonder who Kenny talked to when he got his information?

*standing back, waiting for the usual name-calling, references to my
participation in erotic literature, etc. to deflect attention from being
caught in a lie*

Terri