🚀 go-pugleaf

> Iraq (read Saddam) is not afraid of using chemical or biological
> weapons.

The Bush syndicated crime family is not afraid of using chemical
or biological weapons either.

Then again, neither are the filthy pigs that control the public sector
and the private sector throughout Milwaukee County as they have
been dumping ca-ca water filled with dangerous chemicals and
biological agents into the basements of our homes for 30 years.

I haven't heard you say anything about that. Its much safer to talk
sh!t than it is to get rid of it isn't it?

--
<%= Clinton Gallagher
         A/E/C Consulting, Web Design, e-Commerce Software Development
         Wauwatosa, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin USA
         NET csgallagher@REMOVETHISTEXTmetromilwaukee.com
         URL http://www.metromilwaukee.com/clintongallagher/




"Steve Gehrke" <sgehrke@wi.rr.com> wrote in message news:4348a4e4.0301160913.ffa97c8@posting.google.com...
> There is much more to this than the left would have us believe.
>
> Iraq (read Saddam) is not afraid of using chemical or biological
> weapons. Isreal knows this, why else would they have the Samson plan
> (if you don't know what it is, do some research)? Therefore, the
> problem must be dealt with before it turns into a bigger one.
> Remember, WE lobbyed for the inspections process to begin AGAIN. We
> are doing everything to avoid war. And IF we go to war, it will have
> been carefully planned out.
>
> Enough with Iraq for a moment.
>
> North Korea created this situation for economic gain. They know that
> any attack on South Korea, Japan, or the United States would result in
> all of the UN completely leveling that country. Thus, they're just
> blackmailing the UN in order to get economic aid.
>
> This is not to say that North Korea is any more humane than Iraq, they
> just haven't shown in the past 30 years that they're willing to invade
> their neighboring countries. Iraq did, and the international community
> doesn't take that sort of thing lightly.
>
> All of this is not because we are in bed with Israel, as you would
> make it seem. The Iraqi political establishment hates the US because
> we said NO when they tried to take Kuwait. Ok, maybe we stopped them
> to protect our oil interests.
>
> But what nation wouldn't? And since we stopped an aggressor, didn't we
> do the right thing? I would believe so.
>
>
> knocheskis@yahoo.com (Chris) wrote in message news:<a9c95449.0301150440.21478787@posting.google.com>...
> > Wilhelmus Wallace <WilhelmusW@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<ofi92v88ji4voeo43kq8mulsas9i51a6sg@4ax.com>...
> > > From the Nationalist News Agency:
> > >
> > > http://www.davidduke.com/cgi-bin/mojo-nna/mojo.cgi
> > >
> > > [Talk about double standards! Here the North Koreans, who doubtless
> > > have nukes aimed at the US, tell Bush to shove it and Bush responds by
> > > offering them more aid. No such aid for nearly prostrate, non-nuclear
> > > Iraq. But then, Korea is no threat to Israel. Besides, what can Saddam
> > > really do, launch one of his miserably inaccurate Scuds into the sea?
> > > Bully Boy Bush knows he can puff out his chest and make all the
> > > threats he wants against Iraq. Of course, if he subjected Korea to the
> > > kind of harrassment he's been giving Iraq, Korea might just say "to
> > > hell with this Bush clown" and launch a nuke our way. Far from
> > > preventing the proliferation of nukes, Bush's actions send the clear
> > > lesson to all Muslim countries that possessing nuclear weapons is the
> > > only way to prevent themselves from being bullied by the Zionists and
> > > their American stooges.]
> > >
> > > Bush 'will consider North Korea deal'
> > > BBC
> > >
> > > "US President George W Bush has offered to consider reviving a 'bold
> > > initiative' of benefits for North Korea if it meets American demands
> > > to drop its nuclear ambitions."
> > >
> > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/2658975.stm
> > >
> > > "Every man dies, but not every man truly lives"
> >
> > The rush to develope nukes now turns into a stampede. And why not?
> >
> > Chris