Article View: milw.general
Article #621Re: United? States Our immigration problem.
From: Phil
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:39
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:39
109 lines
7611 bytes
7611 bytes
"Norm???" <storman3@nospam.net> wrote in message news:<QpEW8.72062$wj4.6192766@e3500-atl2.usenetserver.com>... > United? States > Our immigration problem. > > By Rob Sobhani > > > > he House vote to abolish the INS and split it into two bureaus completely > fails to address the root problems America faces as a result of its broken > immigration policy. The 1990s mass immigration to America is the result of > foreign policy directives that failed to address the core problems of > freedom, economic opportunity, and corruption in countries like Mexico, > Egypt, Iran, Pakistan, Russia, India, and the Philippines, among others. > With few exceptions, the citizens of these countries come to America to > escape poverty, repression and corruption, not necessarily to become > Americans. > > Furthermore, our broken immigration system combined with multiculturalism is > eroding America's sovereignty and the national identity of its citizens. > Once in America, recent immigrants have little incentive to become Americans > because the liberal culture tells them that we are a multicultural nation of > immigrants rather than a nation of people from many different countries > embracing the American culture. Separation, not assimilation, has become the > norm: Mexican-American; Pakistani-American; Arab-American; Chinese-American. > This hyphenation of America can only lead to the creation of divided > loyalties, which only plays into the hands of America's enemies, of which > there are many. > > If our elected officials are serious about 1) protecting America's borders, > 2) increasing security at home, 3) creating jobs instead of handouts for > America's disadvantaged, and 4) preserving our national unity, then any > reform needs to address the following issues. > > First, since symbolism is important, renaming the bureau responsible for > assimilating newly arrived immigrants to "The Immigration and > Americanization Service" is a good start. > > Second, language is the glue that holds a country together. English must > become the official language of America. It is the language of our > Constitution and the language of economic opportunity. Unfortunately, both > political parties have started a shameful policy of pandering to recent > immigrants (especially Mexicans) by allowing for a dual-language system. In > my home state of Maryland, you can take a driver's license exam in Spanish, > but why not in Hebrew or Turkish? > > Third, loyalty to America matters, especially after the national calamity of > September 11. We should not apologize for asking immigrants to be patriotic. > The Pledge of Allegiance should once more be a mandatory part of every > child's school day. Swearing-in ceremonies for new American citizens must be > administered only in English and not in any other language. The citizenship > exams - which today only require the prospective citizen to identify their > senators and congressman - must include questions about the history of > America and its Constitution. The issue of dual citizenship must also be > seriously questioned. > > Fourth, since the basis of our current immigration policy is "family > reunification," when one member of an immigrant family gains a foothold he > or she begins a chain migration by bringing in the entire extended family. > This places an enormous burden on our nation's resources. Family members of > recent immigrants expect access to Medicare and Medicaid. The demands on the > public-school system are staggering due to explosive growth in the > population of new immigrant children. Counties throughout America are > struggling to pay for the education of millions of these new immigrant > children, not to mention a bilingual-education bureaucracy that has been > forced upon them. This crowding out of precious resources for elderly and > disadvantaged Americans is a consequence of a failed immigration policy that > can only be addressed by a temporary moratorium on immigrant visas to the > United States. > > The American economy would receive an enormous boost if we cut back on > immigrant visas and instead focused on the issuance of visitors' visas > (another form of family unification without the cost to American taxpayers) > and student visas. Both visas would be temporary. Visitors would spend money > and students would learn about America. Both would eventually have to > return. Of course, it is crucial that the new immigration office devise > strict guidelines governing who is allowed into America and then ensuring > that they do not overstay their visas. > > Fifth, one of America's top moral priorities is the healing of America's > black and native-American communities. To the extent that the large-scale > immigration of the 1990s (illegal as well as legal) interferes with meeting > black Americans' socioeconomic needs, immigration reform must address the > correlation between black unemployment and immigration. Consider what Mark > Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Studies calls "the intersection of > affirmative action and immigration." Since minority status is fungible and > any kind of minority status counts towards the goal of affirmative action, > businesses have avoided hiring blacks simply by hiring immigrants. > Therefore, under the banner of diversity, a window of opportunity has opened > for recent immigrants (primarily Hispanics and Asians) and that same window > has been slammed shut on the black underclass. In short, affirmative > action's black-centered rationale is being undermined by mass immigration. > > America's out-of-control immigration policy should be addressed immediately > by both the Congress and the White House before our country becomes the > Balkanized States of America instead of the United States of America. > > - Rob Sobhani is an adjunct professor at Georgetown University and president > of Caspian Energy Consulting. Our political leaders, Democrats and Republicans, are whoreish scumbags on the immigration issue. Americans are so wimpish as to avoid anything that could be construed as "racist". I truly hope that some outraged citizen takes the law into their hands and "offs" some high profile pro-immigration creep. Phil > > --
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<40d221c9.0207100139.4d8c2014@posting.google.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<QpEW8.72062$wj4.6192766@e3500-atl2.usenetserver.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fb58e,991bb78416c10653,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfb58e,public X-Google-Thread: 10a942,991bb78416c10653,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10a942,public X-Google-Thread: 114271,991bb78416c10653,start X-Google-Attributes: gid114271,public X-Google-Thread: fcd36,991bb78416c10653,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfcd36,public X-Google-Thread: 10e835,991bb78416c10653,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10e835,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-07-10 02:39:46 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: marbleton2002@yahoo.com (Phil) Newsgroups: milw.general,chi.general,rec.backcountry,talk.environment,alt.california Subject: Re: United? States Our immigration problem. Date: 10 Jul 2002 02:39:45 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Lines: 109 Message-ID: <40d221c9.0207100139.4d8c2014@posting.google.com> References: <QpEW8.72062$wj4.6192766@e3500-atl2.usenetserver.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.162.228.176 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1026293985 16379 127.0.0.1 (10 Jul 2002 09:39:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Jul 2002 09:39:45 GMT