🚀 go-pugleaf

On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, ^krp>> wrote:

> "Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message 
> news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1050314223854.26777C-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...

> > Says you.  I have no way of knowing that, since I take your word for
> > nothing.

> OH JESUS Carol you can't be *THAT* stupid can you?

Stupid would be taking anything you say as fact.

> > -- does all sorts of games, however, archiving HIS messages has
> >> NOTHING to do with replying to ME...

> > It had everything to do with the method I employed at the time.

>     Oh BULLSDHIT Carol, BULLSHIT!!!!!!!

Piss and moan; piss and moan.

> > You are very conflicted over this.  Watch your blood pressure!!  One
> > minute you acknowledge folks can post how and where they want.  The next
> > minute you criticize others for doing just that.

> Not conflicted at all. ANNOYED supremely!

As I previously noted:  Watch your blood pressure!!

> You are pissing on my shoes, I complain about it,
> you say I am crazy that it is really raining outside!

Poor baby.

> >> You weren't replying to him but ME........

> > Jealous, are you?

> No IF you had replied to HIM your post and your LAME ASS EXCUSES might 
> make some sense. But your IDIOTIC, and I DO mean IDIOTIC claims that HE 
> posts with a NO ARCHIVE and THAT literally FORCED you to reply to ME by 
> pasting in your reply to MY message in a REPLY to HIM, but it was to me NOT 
> him... Carol if *I* had made such a STUPID excuse...  Well............ Do 
> you know how NUTTY that excuse is?

Anyone who is familiar with PINE and familiar with the google archive tree
probably knows what I am talking about.
 
> >> I am NOT going to go through all your mental gymnastics to try to
> >> rationalize what you did.
 
> > Ask me if I care.
 
> Ask me if I care that you care, LIAR?

I would ask if I cared, but I don't, so I won't.

> >> You were caught in an outright LIE and you're
> >> trying to wiggle free of responsibility.

> > Call it what you will.  What you say makes me no never mind.
 
> I call the whole deal a series of LIES form [sic] you and the latest is 
> psychotic rationalizations. Because Moore uses NO ARCHIVE you REPLIED to HIS 
> post, but NOT to  **HIS** post you replied to MINE by hitting reply to a 
> message YOU CANNOT READ because it "wasn't archived"  MAKE PERFECT SENSE..
> IF you have your head about a half mile up your ass Carol!

I told you I replied in the way I did, and that "no archive" kicks in
after X-number of days.  All of that is true.

Whether it has any affect on your understanding is not up to me.

> >> Nothing new here, but you are having a harder time than normal.
 
> > Actually, I am having a swell time witnessing Kenneth R. Pangborn with his
> > panties in a wad once again.
 
> Yes Carol they get that way dealing with your logic (pretzel). 

Protect your own shoes from piss, Kenneth.

> The problem is that you are so DAMN SERIOUS.

And you are so DAMN funny.

>  All this to escape from saying, 
> "Yeah I added the Cuba Newsgroup back, SO FRIGGIN WHAT!" You are one piece 
> of work Ms. Smith. This latest is AMAZING!!

Your waffling is interesting and AMAZING.  Either folks can post how they
like or they can't.

Which is it?

> 1. Moore Uses no archive so I can't see HIS posts.

Anyone can see his posts up until the date they are removed.  Why is that
so hard for you to understand?

Snip obfuscation intended to make a big hairy deal out of what amounts to
nothing.

~~~~~~~~~~~
Pentagon Hawk Wolfowitz to Run World Bank
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/031605Y.shtml