🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sat, 5 Mar 2005, ~krp~ wrote:

> "Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message 
> news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1050304184458.8043A-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...

> >> >> >> >> How much do you want to suport [sic] this 
> >> >> >> >> jerkoff phoney? How many MORE
> >> >> >> > lies do you need before you conclude he's
> >> >> >> > trash and you quit defending him?

> >> >> >> > What do you interpret as _support_ ?

> >> >> >> > What do you interpret as defense?

> >> >> > I not[e] that no examples have been given.

> >> >> Sure they have, your continued attempts to ARGUE in his favor.

> Sure Carol AGAIN - you disputing everything that has come out about the man! 

How is identifying what has been provided as PROOF as only news reports
construed as defending or supporting the subject of this thread?

> Claiming that "nothing has been proven" when it pretty well has.

Pretty well?  Well, provide that proof.  That is all which is being
requested.  A request for proof is not a defense of a condemnation of
anyone or anything.  However, anyone who makes unfounded allegations is
subject to condemnation.

> >> > I note that, true to form, you have offered absolutely no examples to
> >> > prove your allegation, even though the link to the thread has been
> >> > provided on several occasions.

> >> A link to what?
> 
> > As I stated "the link to the thread has been provided."

> Carol you play STUPID games. You ALWAYS do. It is simple you SUPPORT 
> Churchill because you argue EVERYTHING that has been said about him and you 
> have actually NOT been able to disprove a single  thing.

I have no interest in disproving news reports.

It is not up to me to prove Ward Churchill is responsible for misdoings.
It is up to the people who are accusing him.

However, you are responsible for providing proof that I have supported
Ward Churchill or endorsed him or what he has done, since that is what you
have alleged.

Tsk tsk.  You have been unable to do that, even though the link to the
entire thread has been provided.  




 http://www.politicalgateway.com/news/read.html?id=2739