🚀 go-pugleaf

On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, ~krp~ wrote:

> "Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message 
> news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1050302123019.15431I-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...

> > On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, ~krp~ wrote:

> >> "Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
> >> news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1050228115320.7646B-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...

> >> >> > On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Imno1 wrote:

> >> >> >> >> > No.  It is not a lie at all.  I said that I would like to read
> >> >> >> >> > original
> >> >> >> >> > source documents on this before I venture an opinion, and that 
> >> >> >> >> > is the absolute truth.

>>>>>>> charges that Churchill is a fraud and a plagiarizer are coming from 
>>>>>>> a number of different sources. You keep asking for a smoking gun.

> >> >> > I keep asking (of Kenneth R. Pangborn) direct quotes of claims
> >> >> > he says I have made, of lies he accuses me of having offered.

> > Still no direct quotes have been offered of claims Kenneth R. Pangborn has
> > said I have made, or of lies he accuses me of having offered.

> >> >> >> Churchill is not as important as he or you, think he is,

> >> >> > I have no way of knowing what Churchill is thinking.  Do you?

> >> > Answer the question.  Do you know what Churchill is thinking?

> >> His LOUD MOUTH negates the need for clairvoyance. He TELLS YOU!!!

> > So, share it with us, with adequate citation, of course.
 
> Carol are you brain dead?

Nope.

> You can't shut that arrogant son of a  bitch up.  Her [sic] the jerkoff speak at Whitewater day before Yesterday?  God -
he has diarrhea of the mouth.>>

If the event hadn't been sold out, I would have driven down there to hear
what he had to say.

I am sure there were a lot of people there who were listening for that
reason.  They wanted to hear what he had to say.  That didn't make them
supporters or defenders of the subject or the subject matter.

If the allegations against Ward Churchill are proven to have merit, it is
up to the institution for which he works to deal with it.

If he has commited perjury with regard to artwork, it is up to the
survivors of the artist in question to take Churchill to court for
satisfaction.

> The following links were NEVER posted according to Carol Lee Smith on 
> 3-15-05

How do you know what I wrote on March 15, 2005?  Today is March 2, 2005.
Are you in some kind of time warp?

Thank you for your links to news reports, however:

You can post as many links to news reports as you would like. 

News reports are news reports.

This news report has pictures of the art work in question:

http://news4colorado.com/topstories/local_story_055200531.html

It is possible that it hasn't been previously posted.