Article View: milw.general
Article #862Re: See & Hear Ward Churchill for Yourself - "Some People Push Back"
From: ~krp~
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 00:12
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 00:12
239 lines
10257 bytes
10257 bytes
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1050225164526.5094D-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, ~krp~ wrote:
>
>> "Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
>> news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1050223222353.20515E-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...
>
>> RE: SHOW ME ONE Lie of Ward Churchill::
>
> Is that a direct quote, or your imaginating kickin' in agin' ?
>
>
>> (several listed but snipped or ignored)
>
>> >> >> Not to mention his erroneous claims that "Jews" were the real
>> >> >> culprits
>> >> >> on 9-11.
>
>> >> > How about a citation?
>
>> > How about a citation?
>
>> Changing the subject Carol AGAIN?? DUCK AND WEAVE... Get the first oens..
>
> Oens? What are those?
Ohhh carol is on a roll she found ANOTHER TYPO!!! What does that prove
exactly Carol????? Thatg you are anything but an imbecille????
>
>> We'll GET to that one.
>
>
>> >> >> of doctoring footnotes, claiming to prove that
>> >> >> a smallpox epidemic among the Mandan Indians of the Midwest in 1837
>> >> >> was
>> >> >> deliberately introduced by U.S. Army, when in fact the sources he
>> >> >> cited
>> >> >> said the disease was accidentally spread by traders."
>
>> NO COMMENT --- AVOIDING the direct FABRICATION of material and
>> plagerizing [sic] things.
>
> Would you care to make that into a complete sentence?
>
>
>> >> > Interesting. I would like to read original source documents on this
>> >> > before I venture an opinion.
>
>> >> Carol LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE......
>
>> > No. It is not a lie at all. I said that I would like to read original
>> > source documents on this before I venture an opinion, and that is the
>> > absolute truth.
>
>> Well Carol THEN that is YOUR obligation. The FACT is that Chucrchill's
>> claims that a "biological earfare unit ofd the U.S. Army plotted to
>> commit
>> genicide on the Indian people" citing the 1837 events was a BALD FACE
>> LIE..
>> NEVER HAPPEND! "original source documents' on a FICTITIOUS EVENT Carol?
>> HOW?
>> FROM WHERE?
> Before I comment on what Ward Churchhill wrote, I would prefer to read
> what he wrote. I would not venture to form an opinion on what you say he
> wrote.
THEN READ IT or STFU!
>> >> You asked for "REFERENTS" and I
>> >> provided them you SNIPPED them AGAIN!
>> >> Disregarded them or rationalized them.
>
>> > I snipped what were allegations. I did not snip proof.
>
>> Carol YOU don't get to decide what is proof. I sourced my statements. If
>> Churchill's former wife wrote an article some years before (COPYRIGHTED
>> AND
>> PUBLISHED) and then Churchill later included her work and claimed it as
>> HIS
>> is very much PROOF that he LIED.
>
> Perhaps you could provide a link to information about this.
I DID SILLY! Now you will AGAIN claim I did not.
>> >> Must I post them EVERY DAMNED MESSAGE? This gets SOOOOOOO OLD and NO
>> >> annoying.
>
>> > Tough.
>
>> No Carol PROOF that you are DISHONEST! Thanks for TWICE in a short space
>> that you DELETE things that you don't like and then go on to claim that
>> no
>> proof was offered at all. THAT little girl is LYING!
> I don't consider your comments as any sort of proof.
I gave about half a dozen links Carol, But go ahead and LIE and say I did
not!
>> >> I posted the references to where Churchill's claims of Indian heritage
>> >> are rebuked.
>> > I have seen no proof either way.
>> Yes Carol - in psychology we call that "living in denial." It's all
>> there.
>> Churchill makes SPECIFIC CLAIMS... That he got his indian blood from a
>> SOURCE, that source denies the claim, saying he is NOT indian but
>> "white."
> Of what "SOURCE" do you speak. Are you suggesting that his
> great-great-grandfather came to you in a dream?
READ THE DAMN ARTICLES CAROL!! Or just LIE and say I never posted the links
to them.. You do THAT so werll and so FREQUENTLY!
> Been too long in the sweat lodge, Tonto?
Yeah, I kept thinking I was seeing your image, I knew that I *HAD* to get
out Keemosaaabe! Hey Carol, know what Keeemosaabe REALLY means in Indian
lingo?
>> To YOU that is NOT PROOF! To the THINKING world (the not bullshit
>> infested)
>> that IS PROOF! He has consistenly LIED his ass off about Indian
>> heritage.
>> Maybe I am sensitive to this becayse my first wife WAS 50% native
>> American.
> So, she wasn't a "keeper" ??
Not when she starte don the "fire water" and drugs she wasn't. My
present wife is "indiginous" from Cuba. Meaning that when the Spaniards
(Columbus landed in Cuba) her family was there to welcome them.
> My son-in-law is 100% indigenous. And I think he is a keeper.
I wonder if he thinks the same about you.
>> Complete with tribal registery [sic] so i know what a REAL native
> American is, and I have three daughters that are also on tribal roles. So
> cut your BULLSHITTING Ms., Smith! After a while it gets offensive. The
> man if he has ANY (and I suspect I have as much as HE does) it isn't
> much. My present wife (Cuban) has "indiginous" [sic] blood. She is
> mostly of Spanish heritage but has some native blood as well. Her
> ancestors were there to welcome Columbus when he landed in Cuba.>>
> Thank you so much for the pithy family history.
Glad you enjoyed it. I never make much of the fact that I have some "native"
blood WAY BACK, actually closer than Churchill and more of it. Me no claimum
to be redman! Heap big pow wow at the teepee tonight...! HUMMM!
>> >> I posted where even his former wife accuses him of plagiarizing HER
>> >> earlier published works and claiming them as his own.
>> > Are you saying that what you posted was absolute proof that any
>> > allegations by his wife were true?
>
>> Well some things are FACTS Caol
> The name's Carol.
OH look she found another Typo, I do that when I go too fast Carol
>> no matter how they upset your EXTREMIST political views.
> Your crystal ball is cracked.
I don't need one all I need to do is read your DAILY VENOM!
>> The woman's works were PUBLISHED as were that of Churchill.
>> Media bveen all over that one. Her work came years first, publioshed,
>> copyrights, then his work lifting whole secitions of hers with NO
>> attribution. THAT is fraud and plagerism [sic].
> You can provide cites for that information any time you are ready.
I already did buty feel welcome to LIE AGAIN and claim I didn't.
> Until I read a reliable source, I have no opinion to share. You can
> continue to offer your opinion til the cows come home. I am not
> interested in forming an opinion based upon yours.
Carol NO SOURCE that disagree with your INSANE BULLSHIT is ever "reliable"
to you! And it is gets uncomfortable, you just DENY ever having seen it
no matter how many times your ugly nose is rubbed in it!
> > >> (ACADEMIC FRAUD
>> >> CAROL!) Not to mention the FALSE claims of the U.S. Army biological
>> >> warfare
>> >> against the Indians being a product of his own mind. NEVER HAPPENED
>> >> CAROL!!
>> > I never claimed it did happen. I asked for detail and proof and
>> > evidence.
>> Carol it did NOT happen.
> See above.
READ THE ARTICLES you were providde or LIE AGAIN and say they weren't
provided. Do what you ALWAYS do!
> <snip Kenneth R. Pangborn's interpretation of history>
It was RECORDED history Carol had you READ the links I provided you'd KNOW
that. But you are the little SNIT with the fingers in her ears going "LA LA
LA LA LA LA LA" so she doesn't have to see just HOW wrong she is!
>> > I reserve judgment until I have it. That is the only honorable stance,
>> > as
>> > far as I am concerned.
>> Carol........... it is a tap dance.
> Why do you think it necessary I agree with you?
Look STUPID it isn't **ME** you are agreeing with it is HISTORY and
FACTS!
>> The evidence is there. What DID happen
>> is well documented in history. The sources I gave had further LINKS to
>> that
>> information. That YOU in your ARROGANCE refuse to follow those links is
>> NOT
>> MY PROBLEM it is YOUR DISHONESTY!
> To what dishonesty do you refer?
Like your claims that NO LINKS have EVER been provided...
> What did I insist was true which isn't?
> Please provide appropriate citations.
SHOVE IT!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<0aPTd.17851$uc.17395@trnddc09>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsread.com!newsstand.newsread.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trnddc09.POSTED!a8b0d61d!not-for-mailReferences:
<Pine.OSF.3.96.1050220233452.954A-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu> <CgfSd.2307$OU1.2043@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com> <g1kSd.14278$uc.4826@trnddc09> <421a0f49$1@news.bmi.net> <MpvSd.40864$uc.31615@trnddc03> <Pine.OSF.3.96.1050221232630.32042B-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu> <1TFSd.47294$Dc.45411@trnddc06> <Pine.OSF.3.96.1050222224410.3365E-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu> <4n0Td.44451$uc.34604@trnddc03> <Pine.OSF.3.96.1050223222353.20515E-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu> <%%kTd.48702$wc.42470@trnddc07> <Pine.OSF.3.96.1050225164526.5094D-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fcd36,8085d2e81973fb30 X-Google-Thread: 10dad2,8085d2e81973fb30 X-Google-Thread: f8dda,8085d2e81973fb30 X-Google-Thread: 105dfd,8085d2e81973fb30 X-Google-Thread: 111ebb,8085d2e81973fb30 X-Google-Attributes: gidfcd36,gid10dad2,gidf8dda,gid105dfd,gid111ebb,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsread.com!newsstand.newsread.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trnddc09.POSTED!a8b0d61d!not-for-mail From: "~krp~" <web2457k@verizon.net> Newsgroups: milw.general,soc.retirement,pa.politics,dc.politics,wash.politics References: <Pine.OSF.3.96.1050220233452.954A-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu> <CgfSd.2307$OU1.2043@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com> <g1kSd.14278$uc.4826@trnddc09> <421a0f49$1@news.bmi.net> <MpvSd.40864$uc.31615@trnddc03> <Pine.OSF.3.96.1050221232630.32042B-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu> <1TFSd.47294$Dc.45411@trnddc06> <Pine.OSF.3.96.1050222224410.3365E-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu> <4n0Td.44451$uc.34604@trnddc03> <Pine.OSF.3.96.1050223222353.20515E-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu> <%%kTd.48702$wc.42470@trnddc07> <Pine.OSF.3.96.1050225164526.5094D-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu> Subject: Re: See & Hear Ward Churchill for Yourself - "Some People Push Back" Lines: 243 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original Message-ID: <0aPTd.17851$uc.17395@trnddc09> Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 00:12:44 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.21.17.53 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: trnddc09 1109376764 63.21.17.53 (Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:12:44 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:12:44 EST