Jasmine, we luuuuuvvvve you!!!!

Thread View: milw.general

7 messages

[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles

7 total messages Started by Chelsea007 Fri, 28 Dec 2001 14:00

#645

Author: Chelsea007
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 14:00

14 lines
1555 bytes

Sweet Jesus, thank you for returning baby Jasmine to it's mommy.
Jasmine, if you were old enough to understand what people say please
ignore the nasty comments. A lady in line at the Pick N Save said you
were just a mulatto. Well, poopoo on them. At the office somebody said
your mother, may Jesus bless her, was a fat nigger fucker. Well, she
could lose some weight. And I do hope she marries that fine looking
Mr. Knowles. I do believe she thinks he is your father.

Jasmine, check something when you get older. Find out who paid for
your birth expenses.

Luv

Chelsea

Re: Jasmine, we luuuuuvvvve you!!!!

#643

Author: Denton
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 18:04

21 lines
1933 bytes

callaroselea@yahoo.com (Chelsea007) wrote in message news:<ce3ff649.0112280600.5b854ad@posting.google.com>...
> Sweet Jesus, thank you for returning baby Jasmine to it's mommy.
> Jasmine, if you were old enough to understand what people say please
> ignore the nasty comments. A lady in line at the Pick N Save said you
> were just a mulatto. Well, poopoo on them. At the office somebody said
> your mother, may Jesus bless her, was a fat nigger fucker. Well, she
> could lose some weight. And I do hope she marries that fine looking
> Mr. Knowles. I do believe she thinks he is your father.
> 
> Jasmine, check something when you get older. Find out who paid for
> your birth expenses.
> 
> Luv
> 
> Chelsea

I got the morning paper and sort of gagged. The mother is a low-life
and the father a petty crimianl. Hell, the little biracial princess
might have been better off in W.Virginia.

Denton

Re: Jasmine, we luuuuuvvvve you!!!!

#644

Author: smr
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 21:51

7 lines
1875 bytes

> Hell, the little biracial princess
> might have been better off in W.Virginia.

What kind of spiteful dumb shit do you have to be to feel this sort of
emotion towards a fucking infant?

smr

Re: Jasmine, we luuuuuvvvve you!!!!

#636

Author: ratchet
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 01:46

20 lines
1831 bytes

I believe the reaction was due to media overhype. The mother and father are
garbage. The infant is the usual product of casual low-life couplings.
Though it may sound heartless, I would rather see public money spent on
environmental projects than the support of the infant and it's "family"

Rick



"smr" <the-smr@getthefuckouttahere.the-smr.com> wrote in message
news:RP5X7.427592$8q.36261872@bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com...
> > Hell, the little biracial princess
> > might have been better off in W.Virginia.
>
> What kind of spiteful dumb shit do you have to be to feel this sort of
> emotion towards a fucking infant?
>
> smr
>
>

Re: Jasmine, we luuuuuvvvve you!!!!

#637

Author: Lexx
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 02:49

11 lines
1751 bytes

While swiggin cheap wine and a 40 "smr"
<the-smr@getthefuckouttahere.the-smr.com> wrote in message
news:RP5X7.427592$8q.36261872@bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com...

>
> What kind of spiteful dumb shit do you have to be to feel this sort of
> emotion towards a fucking infant?
>
> smr
>
So your response was made to touch the heart....

Re: Jasmine, we luuuuuvvvve you!!!!

#638

Author: smr
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 04:07

20 lines
2250 bytes

In article <MaaX7.24970$ax5.495105@typhoon.kc.rr.com>, Mysterian_1
@hotmail.com says...
> While swiggin cheap wine and a 40 "smr"
> <the-smr@getthefuckouttahere.the-smr.com> wrote in message
> news:RP5X7.427592$8q.36261872@bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com...
> 
> >
> > What kind of spiteful dumb shit do you have to be to feel this sort of
> > emotion towards a fucking infant?
> >
> > smr
> >
> So your response was made to touch the heart....

The prick who was being so disgustingly cavalier about a child isn't an 
infant and therefore doesn't deserve the benefit of the doubt given a 
child.

-- 
smr

Re: Jasmine, we luuuuuvvvve you!!!!

#639

Author: smr
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 04:08

14 lines
2249 bytes

In article <3c2d215c$0$5680$39cecf19@news.twtelecom.net>, ratchett88
@hotmail.com says...
> I believe the reaction was due to media overhype. The mother and father are
> garbage. The infant is the usual product of casual low-life couplings.
> Though it may sound heartless, I would rather see public money spent on
> environmental projects than the support of the infant and it's "family"

Really. What evidence do you have that the parents are garbage? They are 
a young, not very bright couple. Like most low-income couples. Why even 
try to pretend that you really care "more" about the environment when 
your real issue is racial hatred?

-- 
smr

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads