Article View: misc.consumers.house
Article #5808Re: Is Covering Up Fiberglass Insulation on Ductwork Really an "Extra" for Bay Area Installers??
From: Erik Deckers
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 00:00
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 00:00
25 lines
2298 bytes
2298 bytes
"Anne P. Mitchell, Esq." wrote: > Now, before I blow a vein over this thing, is this really true? I used to > work as an office manager for an HVAC company, and it was not true of that > company, but that was nearly 20 years ago, and on another coast. If it's true > that most companies do not cover up their fiberglass on exposed ductwork, and > that it is an "extra", then we'll have to bite the bullet, and have them come > out and charge us extra to put a barrier between ourselves, our toddler, and > the fiberglass. It just really galls me that it would be considered an > extra, given that OF COURSE you need to not have exposed fiberglass in an area > where there is regular human traffic! Whether it's required or not, you should have it covered. If you go to your local hardware store, and read the warning label on fiberglass insulation, you'll see that there are cancer concerns related to fiberglass insulation of any kind. I think in 10 years we'll see some major changes to fiberglass usage and warning labels. But until then, play it safe and get the extra barrier put over the fiberglass. Erik Deckers WE International, Inc. http://www.foilinsulation.com deckersNOSPAM@yahooNOSPAM.com to email me, drop the NOSPAM
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3958DD47.BA5FD3C@we-intl.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<8j9n4o$gbu$5@isrv4.pa.vix.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10db0a,ab60895378bcadc1 X-Google-Attributes: gid10db0a,public X-Google-Thread: f824f,ab60895378bcadc1 X-Google-Attributes: gidf824f,public X-Google-Thread: 106595,ab60895378bcadc1 X-Google-Attributes: gid106595,public From: Erik Deckers <bothofus@we-intl.com> Subject: Re: Is Covering Up Fiberglass Insulation on Ductwork Really an "Extra" for Bay Area Installers?? Date: 2000/06/27 Message-ID: <3958DD47.BA5FD3C@we-intl.com> X-Deja-AN: 639627975 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <8j9n4o$gbu$5@isrv4.pa.vix.com> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" X-Complaints-To: usenet@nix2.kconline.com X-Trace: nix2.kconline.com 962125133 1129 216.241.130.164 (27 Jun 2000 16:58:53 GMT) Organization: KC Online - HoosierLink Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: bothofus@we-intl.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 27 Jun 2000 16:58:53 GMT Newsgroups: misc.consumers.house,ba.consumers,ba.general