Article View: misc.consumers.house
Article #6148Re: water contaminants/testing -- various questions
From: Mike Nickerson
Date: Thu, 09 May 1996 00:00
Date: Thu, 09 May 1996 00:00
17 lines
1497 bytes
1497 bytes
xmas wrote: > If you are already drinking bottled water, there is no use in getting > your water tested. The main contaminant in water is put there on purpose, > chlorine. Chlorine is now being found to be the leading cause of many > cancers. My advice is this, instead of paying to have your water tested, > just invest that money into an excellant water filtration system. Most > will tell you what they filter and to what levels. I do sell water > filtration units that have been tested by independent labs and are backed > by Good Houskeeping. How do you know what you need to filter out if you don't test the water first? It seems that different chemicals or particles would need different filters. Mike Nickerson miken@boi.hp.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<31922B68.157D@boi.hp.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4mbj33$e5h@agate.berkeley.edu> <318DAC40.526A@en.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10db0a,28b5e63ac49e913c X-Google-Attributes: gid10db0a,public X-Google-Thread: 107518,28b5e63ac49e913c X-Google-Attributes: gid107518,public X-Google-Thread: 10df74,28b5e63ac49e913c X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public From: Mike Nickerson <miken@boi.hp.com> Subject: Re: water contaminants/testing -- various questions Date: 1996/05/09 Message-ID: <31922B68.157D@boi.hp.com> X-Deja-AN: 153916986 references: <4mbj33$e5h@agate.berkeley.edu> <318DAC40.526A@en.com> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Hewlett-Packard Boise Site mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: misc.consumers.house,misc.consumers,ca.environment x-mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; I)