🚀 go-pugleaf

In a previous thread on this subject on alt.privacy, someone suggested
that a bank who was given adequate ID but refused to cash a check
without a fingerprint could be sued.  The rationale would be that
the bank was guilty of breach of contract, in failing to honor a 
check, that is a promise to pay, drawn on it.

Any legal types care to comment?

The Flash

On 5 Sep 1997, Andy Quintana wrote:

> What they are doing is applying a condition to doing business with them,
> like asking for id.  You certainly don't have to provide the id or the
> print, all you have to do is walk away (and try to get your money some
> other way).  Unless enough people can pressure state or federal officials
> to pass new regulations or apply current ones, the best we can do is take
> our businesss elsewhere.  Judging from the reponses I've seen to people
> asking about good banks, people are running away from Crestar already.
> 
> ==========================================================================
> Andy Quintana 			O-			cynical@clark.net
> 		[url removed until I dust off the cobwebs]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 		Ignorance is the root of all evil.
> ==========================================================================
> 
> 
>