Re: Crestar Fingerprinting Assault

Article View: misc.consumers

Article #10986

#10986

From: Jamie
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 1997 00:00

15 lines
1427 bytes


Although not directly related to the discussion at hand, I'm a bit
confused as to the situation here.

Why should Crestar (as opposed to your bank) honor the check, if, as you
said, it was rejected it due to insufficient funds?

A bad check is a bad check.  I've never heard of anyone being able to
cash a bad check simply going to the issuing bank personally.  The
reason you couldn't cash it at your bank in the first place, is because
Crestar themselves had rejected it due to insufficient funds.  Why would
showing up there in person change that situation?

Jamie

Technical Details

Message-ID: <341067BA.5865@digex.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <5ujs1c$i1t3@beaker.nit.gwu.edu> <3410612B.F7F@ix.netcom.com> <3410531E.7E0C@wco.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1038e3,bd68304469da4d0a
X-Google-Attributes: gid1038e3,public
X-Google-Thread: 104271,bd68304469da4d0a
X-Google-Attributes: gid104271,public
X-Google-Thread: f4d80,bd68304469da4d0a
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d80,public
X-Google-Thread: 107518,6a2050cc875c3006
X-Google-Attributes: gid107518,public
X-Google-Thread: 101049,bd68304469da4d0a
X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public
From: Jamie <jamie@digex.net>
Subject: Re: Crestar Fingerprinting Assault
Date: 1997/09/05
Message-ID: <341067BA.5865@digex.net>
X-Deja-AN: 270066861
References: <5ujs1c$i1t3@beaker.nit.gwu.edu> <3410612B.F7F@ix.netcom.com> <3410531E.7E0C@wco.com>
Organization: DIGEX, Inc.
Reply-To: jamie@digex.NOSPAM.net
Newsgroups: misc.consumers,misc.legal,alt.law-enforcement,alt.privacy,dc.general

Reply to Parent Message