Article View: misc.consumers
Article #11309Re: KOSHER TAX RIPOFF!! Heinz/Libby Dump-Too Expensive for Consumers!! More Info
From: Wai Doan Hsu
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 22:18
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 22:18
60 lines
4162 bytes
4162 bytes
Vandiver606@hotmail.com (Tom) wrote in message news:<275fc558.0306270954.1cf02574@posting.google.com>... > "barry in indy" <iamnot@home.com> wrote in message news:<c2VKa.2543$Vx2.1373911@newssvr28.news.prodigy.com>... > > "Tom" <Vandiver606@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:275fc558.0306261728.6f95148@posting.google.com... > > > Boris Dynin <boris@movil.com> wrote in message > news:<decjfv41q2s9o89no3mlpk0lqfkr6ibf5q@4ax.com>... > > > > > > This Kosher food and product racket has been going on too long. Start > > > looking at your shelves. At one time Brillo pads were "kosher". > > > Imagine if some White sect started the same extortion program! > > > > > > > This hidden tax gets passed, of course, to all non-Jewish consumers > of > > > > the products. The scam is to coerce the companies to pay up or > suffer > > > > the consequences of a Jewish boycott. Jewish consumers have learned > > > > not to buy any kitchen product that does not have the (U) the (K) > and > > > > other similar markings. > > > > > > > > > > > Bull! Only "religious" Jews pay any attention to the U and K markings. > > And I'm certain you will find that the majority of the Jews in the US > > are NOT religious, or at least do not care if they eat ham, mix milk and > > meat, or use non-kosher products. > > > The point is the "kosher" label does not come free. The consumer pays > for this fraud. > > Tom Yes, there is a fraud. The "kosher tax" scam is a fraud because there is no such thing. This a hoax. Check out http://www.snopes.com/racial/business/kosher.htm . While studies have shown that the cost per item is perhaps a tenth of a penny per item, this is misleading. Since the quantity of items produced goes up, chances are that the per unit cost is actually lower with kosher certification. Any company will do an analysis to see if it's cost effective. It it's not, they won't certify their products. Coca Cola, for instance, is kosher for Passover in New York, but not kosher at all in other parts of the country. They look at the market and decide if it will improve their bottom line or not. If the increased net profit is higher than the cost of certification, then a company will do it because they make more money, and their profit per unit is higher and they can in theory afford to charge nominally less. Furthermore, it does not cost them a penny to put a K on the box (with or without a circle around it) if they want to certify on their own that the product is kosher in a manner consistent with their understanding of Jewish law. The whole scam is one perpetuated by racists. Read the snopes article.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<d31826ae.0307021418.4572c7ef@posting.google.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<78qefvkld2cic77pl4ibjf25mh4a1b0scv@4ax.com> <decjfv41q2s9o89no3mlpk0lqfkr6ibf5q@4ax.com> <275fc558.0306261728.6f95148@posting.google.com> <c2VKa.2543$Vx2.1373911@newssvr28.news.prodigy.com> <275fc558.0306270954.1cf02574@posting.google.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 101eb4,a942604ac30ff44e X-Google-Attributes: gid101eb4,public X-Google-Thread: f6c48,a942604ac30ff44e X-Google-Attributes: gidf6c48,public X-Google-Thread: 107518,a942604ac30ff44e X-Google-Attributes: gid107518,public X-Google-Thread: 10d662,a942604ac30ff44e X-Google-Attributes: gid10d662,public X-Google-Thread: 10fa57,a942604ac30ff44e X-Google-Attributes: gid10fa57,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-07-02 15:18:55 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: waidoan@hotmail.com (Wai Doan Hsu) Newsgroups: misc.consumers,misc.consumers.frugal-living,ok.general,fl.general,mi.misc Subject: Re: KOSHER TAX RIPOFF!! Heinz/Libby Dump-Too Expensive for Consumers!! More Info Date: 2 Jul 2003 15:18:54 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Lines: 60 Message-ID: <d31826ae.0307021418.4572c7ef@posting.google.com> References: <78qefvkld2cic77pl4ibjf25mh4a1b0scv@4ax.com> <decjfv41q2s9o89no3mlpk0lqfkr6ibf5q@4ax.com> <275fc558.0306261728.6f95148@posting.google.com> <c2VKa.2543$Vx2.1373911@newssvr28.news.prodigy.com> <275fc558.0306270954.1cf02574@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.116.6.181 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1057184334 7435 127.0.0.1 (2 Jul 2003 22:18:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 2 Jul 2003 22:18:54 GMT