Article View: misc.consumers
Article #11316Re: KOSHER TAX RIPOFF!! Heinz/Libby Dump-Too Expensive for Consumers!! More Info
From: Ken
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 22:49
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 22:49
57 lines
4156 bytes
4156 bytes
Vandiver606@hotmail.com (Tom) wrote in message news:<275fc558.0306270954.1cf02574@posting.google.com>... > "barry in indy" <iamnot@home.com> wrote in message news:<c2VKa.2543$Vx2.1373911@newssvr28.news.prodigy.com>... > > "Tom" <Vandiver606@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:275fc558.0306261728.6f95148@posting.google.com... > > > Boris Dynin <boris@movil.com> wrote in message > news:<decjfv41q2s9o89no3mlpk0lqfkr6ibf5q@4ax.com>... > > > > > > This Kosher food and product racket has been going on too long. Start > > > looking at your shelves. At one time Brillo pads were "kosher". > > > Imagine if some White sect started the same extortion program! > > > > > > > This hidden tax gets passed, of course, to all non-Jewish consumers > of > > > > the products. The scam is to coerce the companies to pay up or > suffer > > > > the consequences of a Jewish boycott. Jewish consumers have learned > > > > not to buy any kitchen product that does not have the (U) the (K) > and > > > > other similar markings. > > > > > > > > > > > Bull! Only "religious" Jews pay any attention to the U and K markings. > > And I'm certain you will find that the majority of the Jews in the US > > are NOT religious, or at least do not care if they eat ham, mix milk and > > meat, or use non-kosher products. > > > The point is the "kosher" label does not come free. The consumer pays > for this fraud. > > Tom Tom, If you wish to present your point in a more balanced light, it would be best not to quote from the La Voz de Aztlan site. Any site that superimposes a swastika on top of the Israeli flag could not be considered unbiased. (Look down the left side of the site.) I'm not sure why La Voz de Aztlan, The Voice of Alta California (California in the U.S.), devotes much of it's site to anti-Israeli articles. A major corporation having its product designated as kosher is the same as a major corporation having its product designated as organic: It's just a business decision. And that corporation is going to charge you the maximum amount it can no matter what its expenses are. So if that hamburger or can of peaches costs $1.00 with the kosher label, it would be the same $1.00 without the label. Are the corporations being ripped-off to have the ability to put a kosher label on their product? I'd say yes. But it's not a tax, a tax is imposed by the government. And if the corporation wishes to spend their money in this fashion as basically advertising, it's theirs to with as they see profitable. I don't see why it concerns you or La Voz de Aztlan unless you are shareholders in the corporation. Ken
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<971f0a.0306271449.6570ab67@posting.google.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<78qefvkld2cic77pl4ibjf25mh4a1b0scv@4ax.com> <decjfv41q2s9o89no3mlpk0lqfkr6ibf5q@4ax.com> <275fc558.0306261728.6f95148@posting.google.com> <c2VKa.2543$Vx2.1373911@newssvr28.news.prodigy.com> <275fc558.0306270954.1cf02574@posting.google.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 101eb4,a942604ac30ff44e X-Google-Attributes: gid101eb4,public X-Google-Thread: 10d662,a942604ac30ff44e X-Google-Attributes: gid10d662,public X-Google-Thread: 107518,a942604ac30ff44e X-Google-Attributes: gid107518,public X-Google-Thread: f6c48,a942604ac30ff44e X-Google-Attributes: gidf6c48,public X-Google-Thread: 10fa57,a942604ac30ff44e X-Google-Attributes: gid10fa57,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-27 15:49:52 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: threeriversguy_2000@yahoo.com (Ken) Newsgroups: misc.consumers,misc.consumers.frugal-living,ok.general,fl.general,mi.misc Subject: Re: KOSHER TAX RIPOFF!! Heinz/Libby Dump-Too Expensive for Consumers!! More Info Date: 27 Jun 2003 15:49:52 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Lines: 57 Message-ID: <971f0a.0306271449.6570ab67@posting.google.com> References: <78qefvkld2cic77pl4ibjf25mh4a1b0scv@4ax.com> <decjfv41q2s9o89no3mlpk0lqfkr6ibf5q@4ax.com> <275fc558.0306261728.6f95148@posting.google.com> <c2VKa.2543$Vx2.1373911@newssvr28.news.prodigy.com> <275fc558.0306270954.1cf02574@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 165.247.224.208 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1056754192 2645 127.0.0.1 (27 Jun 2003 22:49:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 27 Jun 2003 22:49:52 GMT