Article View: misc.consumers
Article #5038Re: Bread makers: recommendations?
From: Richard Foulk
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 16:50
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 16:50
94 lines
4849 bytes
4849 bytes
>: I don't personally own one, but, my brother has a Welbilt model >: that came highly reccommended. > >Different strokes, I guess. I have a low opinion of the DAK/Welbilt machines. >Here's my standard posting on that: > > >From my observations of several years of DAK-comments on the net, >including following the entire history of the bread-machine mailing list: >(note, the list is now defunct, so don't bother asking how to subscribe) I've had a DAK machine for several years and I recommend it. I use mine a lot and will buy another when/if I ever wear this one out. > - I don't recall EVER seeing a complaint for Hitachi, Panasonic, > Zojirushi, et al breadmakers. I DO recall seeing comments and > recommendations from *many* happy owners of these machines. Considering the vast difference in price (until recently) it seems likely that DAK and Welbilt have sold many times more units than the other folks. > - Many owners of DAK/Welbilt breadmakers are happy with their machines. > > - MANY owners of DAK/Welbilt breadmakers are NOT happy with their > machines, myself included. I have heard many dozens of complaints, > ranging from "it started making gooey-centered bread" to "it locked up > while baking, filled my house with smoke, and melted the plastic casing > before I got home and pulled the plug on it." I can get gooey centers with my machine too if I screw up the recipe badly enough. Bet I can do it with any of the other machines too. > - The people who had problems with DAK/Welbilt machines have had virtually > NO satisfaction from the DAK and Welbilt "customer service" organizations, > ranging from "couldn't call the number, I tried for weeks and it was > always busy" to "They sent me back the same machine with no apparent > fixes or improvement." I had a problem initially and got fairly good response. I sent my machine in and got a replacement back fairly promptly. This guy is generalizing from net hearsay, where people often don't say much unless they have a problem. I've had my machine for several years and am very satisfied, and I have several friends that have purchased them on my recommendations and are also well satisfied. > - Many, many people have sent their machines in for repairs and had it > replaced, or were so unsatisfied with their machines that they just > returned them. My conjecture is that these unsatisfactory machines > are "buffed up" and sold as "reconditioned" models. (If they didn't > fix the damn things when they were repeatedly sent in for repair while > under warrantee, why would they fix them before reselling them?) Bull. Where does the information come from to be able to say `many, many people ...'? One of my friends bought her DAK Turbo 2 (or whatever it's called, I forgot) as reconditioned and is very satisfied. I made several loaves of bread with it when she first got it and it worked pretty much just like mine. >My conclusion from the above, AND the frequent complaints on the net >about DAK's service, products, hype, etc., is that I would definitely >recommend that someone spend the $30 to $100 more to get a *good* >breadmaker. Get one that you can enjoy, and avoid the ruined loaves, >frustration, returns for repair, etc. It's WORTH the extra money. I followed the same mailing lists and newsgroups and this claim of `frequent complaints' is an exaggeration, in my opinion. I make lots of bread in my old DAK machine and it's still cranking. The only time I get `ruined loaves' is when I'm experimenting with modifications to a recipe or something like that ... and if I'm around to watch it bake I can usually fix those. The things aren't perfect, but within bounds they're pretty damn nice. I used to think that $150 would buy a lifetime supply of bread ... but I can't buy bread as nice as the stuff I can bake fresh in my kitchen. Heck, you can buy a breadmaker from DAK and try it for 30 days (45 days for a reconditioned one, I think). And if you don't like it for any reason you can send it back. [I have no connections with DAK other than as a satisfied customer that thinks much of what they sell, other than their bread machines, is kind of junky.] -- Richard Foulk richard@pegasus.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan8.165057.6200@pegasus.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!news!humu!pegasus!richardReferences:
<1993Jan5.133028.21583@nsisrv.gsfc.nasa.gov> <1ic8brINNs68@hpfcbig.sde.hp.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: misc.consumers Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!news!humu!pegasus!richard From: richard@pegasus.com (Richard Foulk) Subject: Re: Bread makers: recommendations? Message-ID: <1993Jan8.165057.6200@pegasus.com> Organization: Pegasus, Honolulu References: <1993Jan5.133028.21583@nsisrv.gsfc.nasa.gov> <1ic8brINNs68@hpfcbig.sde.hp.com> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 93 16:50:57 GMT Lines: 94