🚀 go-pugleaf

>Here is a new question:  Isn't this a little vulnerable?  The
>Government can now look me up since I'm such a sucker, already
>signed up.  Is this a new resource to build the Big Brother
>phenomenon?  Comments, Barry?

First, here's an idea to help verification that is far from perfect
(I'll describe it's worst problems) but is a lot better than nothing.

The original problem was someone changing your entry, say the e-mail
address, with malicious intent (eg. to receive your mail.)

One possibility is to always e-mail a summary of changes (or the entry
itself) whenever it is changed. If the mail address is changed you
send to the old and new address.

Problems remaining: This is, in OS parlance, known as detection
(you'll know someone has changed something) but is neither avoidance
nor prevention of the problem. For example, I could write a shell
script changing your address every 30 seconds and all you will have is
the knowledge that it is being done, there's still no mechanism to
stop me or make it difficult for me to do this (difficult could be you
only get to make 2 changes in a day/week whatever, or a cookie is
stored like a password you must present to change the entry, even that
has serious problems given the insecurity of the mail networks and the
just plain nuisance of people forgetting their cookies over time.)

This also does not address the problem of someone initially creating
an entry with malicious intent, before you get a chance to create one
for yourself they do. In fact, you may not have the slightest interest
in using the service so don't even know I have created an entry which
is telling people to send mail destined for you to me. Some of that is
outside, but it could be quite a tool in the hands of a specific
malicious prank.

As to the "big brother" aspect, I don't know, is the telephone white
pages a big brother problem? I think if anything I'd be more concerned
with businesses using it to create junk mail lists (if for no other
reason than you might at that point be interpreted, willingly or
otherwise, as using the network to compete with commercial junk mail
list compilers, something I know ARPA is very sensitive about, thou
shalt not use govt subsidies to compete with equivalent commercial
services.) Like I said, intention could be irrelevant if the harm
exists anyhow.

Anyhow, as to the mere ability to look you up, that's probably
unavoidable, I would imagine it would take but a few hours to write a
program to filter all USENET traffic and store the FROM: fields to
create one's own list. You can't have it both ways.

From: tr@wind.bellcore.com (tom reingold)

If you get my drift...

	-Barry Shein, Boston University