🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sep 8, 5:18 pm, gringogirl <sumarli...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> ACLU and US Unions Protect Illegal Aliens' Employment
> It is well-known that illegal aliens often use false Social Security
> numbers in seeking employment in the US. Research has shown that in
> some instances, hundreds of illegals are using the same number, often
> taken from a real and employed American. To deal with this, Homeland
> Security adopted a new regulation requiring employers to take action
> when notified that an employee had an apparently false Social Security
> number.
>
> The ACLU and the AFL-CIO claimed that this would be used as "an
> excuse" for employers to fire employees. But the law allows the
> employee 90 days to correct the problem before they would be fired.
> The San Francisco judge who issued the injunction was appointed by
> former President Clinton. If the injunction is made permanent pending
> trial, the appeal would go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in
> San Francisco, the most "liberal" and the most-reversed Circuit in the
> nation.
>
> A logical conclusion was that the plaintiffs did some serious judge-
> shopping in this case. It could have been filed in any federal court
> in the nation. They chose to file it in San Francisco, where Homeland
> Security might have to appeal all the way to the US Supreme Court to
> dispense with this attack on efforts to deal with illegal aliens in
> the US.
>
> Notice this telling statement about the case by John Sweeney,
> president of the AFL-CIO, who said, "This rule is a new tool to
> repress workers' rights in the name of phony immigration enforcement."
> Notice this statement assumes that illegal aliens using other people's
> Social Security numbers have a "right" to do exactly that, and that
> American labor unions are in the business of protecting those
> "rights."
>
> The facts for this article, but not the legal conclusions, come from
> Webwire, an Internet resource for recently broken stories. This
> article was published on 4 September, based on ACLU documents.
>
> Go here to find this article on the Net.
>
> Posted by John Armor on September