Article View: misc.consumers
Article #5764Re: Alternatives to Comcast?
From: Brad Bishop
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 13:07
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 13:07
40 lines
3043 bytes
3043 bytes
> >Just got notification that Comcast is "improving" their service on > >6/2/04. The net effect of this "improvement" is, if we want to get > >the same basic channels we do now, our monthly bill will increase > >from $15/month to $42/month. > > Heh heh - good old Comcast! The one thing they are good at is raising rates. > They can't fix the snow and interference in the picture, but they excel at > lining their pockets... I'm not complaining about Comcast, specifically, here but I was a little annoyed back when I used to have cable (I now have DirecTV) and my basic problems were: * Whenever it would rain the cable would go out. I never called them on this one but I assume their boxes got flooded out and it shorted out their signal. It's interesting that they tout 'rain fade' was one of the things you don't have to worry about with cable. With cable, though, it'd take a good number of hours (up to a day or so) for the signal to clear up after a storm. With DirecTV (and a properly aligned dish) the only rain fade I've experienced was when the storm was so nasty that you'd want to unplug everything anyway. * Some local channels were so bad that they were unwatchable. I called them on this a few times. Each time their answer was the same, "You're getting interference from the local channels and it's wiping out the cable channels." Well, that's fine but I'm paying the cable company for cable and I couldn't get some local channels. It seemed like the proper answer would have been for them to find the signal leak or, if it were impossible to fix for that particular channel, move the channel to a new location (obviously not just for me but it would seem like it'd be a system wide problem if they couldn't fix it for me and that was their answer). The end result it that I went with DirecTV. The cable company could have done something to address the signal problems I was having but they showed no interest. I'm not anti-cable or anything. I've had some good experiences with cable companies (CableVision comes to mind). I've had really good experiences with DirecTV so, until they screw up, they've got my business. Brad
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<c8ss1s0q39@news4.newsguy.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!controlnews3.google.com!news1.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!pln-w!spln!dex!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news4References:
<2hcnqdFbj686U1@uni-berlin.de> <0403b01l8stes1f0td718lr86dutbnkugu@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 107518,ca03142809305096 X-Google-Thread: 106595,ca03142809305096 X-Google-Attributes: gid107518,gid106595,public Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!controlnews3.google.com!news1.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!pln-w!spln!dex!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news4 From: "Brad Bishop" <bsbishop@newsguy.com> Newsgroups: misc.consumers,ba.consumers Subject: Re: Alternatives to Comcast? Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 09:07:08 -0400 Organization: http://newsguy.com Lines: 42 Message-ID: <c8ss1s0q39@news4.newsguy.com> References: <2hcnqdFbj686U1@uni-berlin.de> <0403b01l8stes1f0td718lr86dutbnkugu@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: p-342.newsdawg.com X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409