Article View: misc.consumers
Article #5826Re: Latest AT&T broadband pitch (scam)
From: George Grapman
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 04:29
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 04:29
60 lines
3687 bytes
3687 bytes
Joe Chung wrote: > > Long distance rates have been subjected to competition, and > serious competition only recently. They used to be higher when Ma > Bell was one big company. > > There are many more services out there where prices have not come > down, even in the face of "competition", like college tuition, > legal fees, or medical costs. > > In the case of a monopolistic cable TV company, a better > comparison would be the telephone, gas, electricity company, > i.e. other monopolistic utilities that provide a continuous (and > sometimes essential) service. > > As for the TV and computer itself, electronic items have been > subjected to both the forces of great leaps in advancement and > steep competition over the years. > > And yet there are prices of mundane consumer items, like stamps, > grocery bills, haircuts, etc. that counters the technology > examples. > > Maybe the dish TV companies will give some serious competition to > the Cable companies, and then the prices may come down. > It is already happening. I pay less money for more channels with Dish Network compared to AT&T cable. In 6 months I have had one outage lasting all of two minutes. The one time that I had a problem with the receiver I got a live person on the phone in under a minute who walked me through the steps of reprogramming the box. When AT&T calls to try to retrieve my business I start naming the channels that they don't have but dish does. By the way, the picture quality is much better than cable. > > > Either way you look at it, your Cable Internet rate is going up > to about $60; you can either buy Cable TV with that, or not. > > It's no different than if my magazine subscription rate went up, > but they offer to sell me a subscription to a second magazine as > a bribe to keep the first rate the same. In the end, my out of > pocket expense is the same. > > I'm not saying what they're doing is right or good for the > consumer, but that the end-result, the raising of rates, is not > that uncommon. > > -jc -- To reply via e-mail please delete "NOSPAM" from address.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3E4487DA.118B5394@NOSPAMpacbell.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!enews.sgi.com!prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr12.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<2Oq0a.8054$vm2.5157@rwcrnsc54> <uk7gcwqxb.fsf@hotmail.com> <3E438152.6EADDB33@nospam.com> <uisvwhru2.fsf@hotmail.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 107518,6b425ca9a55a7132 X-Google-Attributes: gid107518,public X-Google-Thread: 106595,6b425ca9a55a7132 X-Google-Attributes: gid106595,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-07 20:30:02 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!enews.sgi.com!prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr12.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3E4487DA.118B5394@NOSPAMpacbell.net> From: George Grapman <sfgeorge@NOSPAMpacbell.net> Reply-To: sfgeorge@NOSPAMpacbell.net Organization: . X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en]C-PBI-NC472 (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: misc.consumers,ba.consumers Subject: Re: Latest AT&T broadband pitch (scam) References: <2Oq0a.8054$vm2.5157@rwcrnsc54> <uk7gcwqxb.fsf@hotmail.com> <3E438152.6EADDB33@nospam.com> <uisvwhru2.fsf@hotmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 62 NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.118.252.132 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: newssvr12.news.prodigy.com 1044678544 ST000 67.118.252.132 (Fri, 07 Feb 2003 23:29:04 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 23:29:04 EST X-UserInfo1: TSU[@I_A\S@YRPTX]ZONO_TDFRYB@GXLN@GZ_GYO^ZUDUWYAKVUOPCW[ML\JXUCKVFDYZKBMSFX^OMSAFNTINTDDMVW[X\THOPXZRVOCJTUTPC\_JSBVX\KAOTBAJBVMZTYAKMNLDI_MFDSSOLXINH__FS^\WQGHGI^C@E[A_CF\AQLDQ\BTMPLDFNVUQ_VM Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 04:29:04 GMT