🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: misc.consumers
Article #5826

Re: Latest AT&T broadband pitch (scam)

#5826
From: George Grapman
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 04:29
60 lines
3687 bytes

Joe Chung wrote:

>
> Long distance rates have been subjected to competition, and
> serious competition only recently.  They used to be higher when Ma
> Bell was one big company.
>
> There are many more services out there where prices have not come
> down, even in the face of "competition", like college tuition,
> legal fees, or medical costs.
>
> In the case of a monopolistic cable TV company, a better
> comparison would be the telephone, gas, electricity company,
> i.e. other monopolistic utilities that provide a continuous (and
> sometimes essential) service.
>
> As for the TV and computer itself, electronic items have been
> subjected to both the forces of great leaps in advancement and
> steep competition over the years.
>
> And yet there are prices of mundane consumer items, like stamps,
> grocery bills, haircuts, etc. that counters the technology
> examples.
>
> Maybe the dish TV companies will give some serious competition to
> the Cable companies, and then the prices may come down.
>

  It is already happening. I pay less money for more channels with Dish
Network compared to AT&T cable. In 6 months I have had one outage
lasting all of two minutes. The one time that
I had a problem with the receiver I got a live person on the phone in
under a  minute who walked me through the steps of reprogramming the
box.
  When AT&T calls to try to retrieve my business I start naming the
channels that they don't have but dish does.
  By the way, the picture quality is much better than cable.



>
>
> Either way you look at it, your Cable Internet rate is going up
> to about $60; you can either buy Cable TV with that, or not.
>
> It's no different than if my magazine subscription rate went up,
> but they offer to sell me a subscription to a second magazine as
> a bribe to keep the first rate the same.  In the end, my out of
> pocket expense is the same.
>
> I'm not saying what they're doing is right or good for the
> consumer, but that the end-result, the raising of rates, is not
> that uncommon.
>
> -jc

--
   To reply via e-mail please delete "NOSPAM" from address.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3E4487DA.118B5394@NOSPAMpacbell.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!enews.sgi.com!prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr12.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <2Oq0a.8054$vm2.5157@rwcrnsc54> <uk7gcwqxb.fsf@hotmail.com> <3E438152.6EADDB33@nospam.com> <uisvwhru2.fsf@hotmail.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 107518,6b425ca9a55a7132
X-Google-Attributes: gid107518,public
X-Google-Thread: 106595,6b425ca9a55a7132
X-Google-Attributes: gid106595,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-07 20:30:02 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!enews.sgi.com!prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr12.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3E4487DA.118B5394@NOSPAMpacbell.net>
From: George Grapman <sfgeorge@NOSPAMpacbell.net>
Reply-To: sfgeorge@NOSPAMpacbell.net
Organization: .
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en]C-PBI-NC472  (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: misc.consumers,ba.consumers
Subject: Re: Latest AT&T broadband pitch (scam)
References: <2Oq0a.8054$vm2.5157@rwcrnsc54> <uk7gcwqxb.fsf@hotmail.com> <3E438152.6EADDB33@nospam.com> <uisvwhru2.fsf@hotmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 62
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.118.252.132
X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net
X-Trace: newssvr12.news.prodigy.com 1044678544 ST000 67.118.252.132 (Fri, 07 Feb 2003 23:29:04 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 23:29:04 EST
X-UserInfo1: TSU[@I_A\S@YRPTX]ZONO_TDFRYB@GXLN@GZ_GYO^ZUDUWYAKVUOPCW[ML\JXUCKVFDYZKBMSFX^OMSAFNTINTDDMVW[X\THOPXZRVOCJTUTPC\_JSBVX\KAOTBAJBVMZTYAKMNLDI_MFDSSOLXINH__FS^\WQGHGI^C@E[A_CF\AQLDQ\BTMPLDFNVUQ_VM
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 04:29:04 GMT