🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: misc.consumers
Article #5860

Re: CA Assembly votes to triple car tax

#5860
From: Don Klipstein
Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2003 08:51
41 lines
3793 bytes
In article <slrnb3ph3g.hm.joel-garry@zr1.vista1.sdca.cox.net>, Joel Garry 
wrote in part:
> Don Klipstein ><don@manx.misty.com> wrote:

>>  Real estate will not spend decades on end giving double-digit annual 
>>rate of return.  The stock market will do a little better, although bonds 
>
>Not true about the stock market.  That rate of return is an accounting 
>fiction which does _not_ include write-offs of companies that go belly-up.
>A true rate of return would include that.  Remember, Polaroid was once a
>solid stock.

  Sorry to hear your misinformation, but total USA stock market rate of
return is already discounted for stocks that belly-up.

  Now for what a reasonably expected rate of return should be:  USA annual 
GDP growth plus the reciprocal of average USA stock P/E ratio, however 
appropriately weighted.  Ever since the Industrial Revolution, USA 
economic growth has outpaced inflation by almost 3 percent per year!  Add 
to this the reciprocal of P/E ratio - this yields reinvestment of USA 
publicly-traded corporations into themselves and/or each other - even at
the current/recently inflated 25-30 (compared to historical 15) PE ratio
this means annual rate of return 3.3-4 percent ahead of USA population 
growth and inflation.  Subtract a bit for buyers following the herd and 
buying high, and this still means probably 2-3.5% annual rate of return 
beyond the sum of inflation and population growth.  Detract from that 
increase in the number of competing corporations - but for over half a 
century the 500 biggest publicly traded corporations in the USA have held
a roughly 60-70% piece of the stock-exchange-traded pie!
  Sounds like a broad USA stock index mutual fund should in the very long 
term have an annual total return at least 7-8%, with some mobility towards 
the 9% average experienced even from the 1929 high until now.  Compare to 
real estate price appreciation - how do you project most peaple to have 
such wage growth to afford such a thing?  I do agree that real estate will 
outperform inflation at least a little bit and will probably outperform 
long term trends in commodities, but stocks reinvest profits of businesses 
(or let you do so, mostly automatic with mutual funds) and that means a 
few percent total return beyond the combination of inflation and economic 
growth.

 - Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)
Technical Details
Message-ID: <slrnb3pn0b.f0m.don@manx.misty.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.litech.org!news.misty.com!don
References: <c678797a.0301292356.17b87079@posting.google.com> <b1bqi9$m0a$2@naig.caltech.edu> <3E397321.3080609@www.net> <v91j3vgtssn64vokhttkcb5p8rda01qn7s@4ax.com> <v3j36d8bnmvtf2@corp.supernews.com> <m94j3vkor5o8nm4e5rsniiainehhnp01ug@4ax.com> <p6bj3v88oujtjijcaqonpi283qg2v0963s@4ax.com> <slrnb3mprl.299.don@manx.misty.com> <slrnb3ph3g.hm.joel-garry@zr1.vista1.sdca.cox.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 107518,73ea2760087c9f27
X-Google-Attributes: gid107518,public
X-Google-Thread: 10001a,73ea2760087c9f27
X-Google-Attributes: gid10001a,public
X-Google-Thread: 106595,73ea2760087c9f27
X-Google-Attributes: gid106595,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-02 00:51:24 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.litech.org!news.misty.com!don
From: don@manx.misty.com (Don Klipstein)
Newsgroups: misc.consumers,ba.consumers,ca.driving
Subject: Re: CA Assembly votes to triple car tax
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 08:51:23 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: MGT Consulting
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <slrnb3pn0b.f0m.don@manx.misty.com>
References: <c678797a.0301292356.17b87079@posting.google.com> <b1bqi9$m0a$2@naig.caltech.edu> <3E397321.3080609@www.net> <v91j3vgtssn64vokhttkcb5p8rda01qn7s@4ax.com> <v3j36d8bnmvtf2@corp.supernews.com> <m94j3vkor5o8nm4e5rsniiainehhnp01ug@4ax.com> <p6bj3v88oujtjijcaqonpi283qg2v0963s@4ax.com> <slrnb3mprl.299.don@manx.misty.com> <slrnb3ph3g.hm.joel-garry@zr1.vista1.sdca.cox.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: manx.misty.com
X-Trace: news.misty.com 1044175883 20534 198.137.254.20 (2 Feb 2003 08:51:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@misty.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 08:51:23 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.6.3 (SunOS)