🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: misc.consumers
Article #6871

Re: MCI vs Sprint

#6871
From: Paul Masters
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 00:00
37 lines
2688 bytes
> > My LD carrier charges a "flat" in-state rate (certain per-minute rate
> > applies all the time); on weekends they are higher than Sprint's
> > "BASE" rate.  So on weekends, I just dial 10333+ for in-state calls.
> 
> Send this man to the head of the class. That is exactly how one gets the
> lowest possible rates. It requires the use of multiple carriers. The
> carrier for a given call will be selected on the basis of destination and
> time, and even sometimes anticipated duration of the call might be a
> factor.
> 
> Rather than sit back and expect suppliers to "come crawling", the consumer
> who takes a pro-active stance will ultimately win. Telemarketing people
> have asked, "Who is your long distance company?" My answer is, "It
> depends."
> 
> That's the secret; that is how it is done. Shop the carriers; open
> accounts with a number of them; and use the appropriate one for the
> appropriate call. And be prepared to look beyond the end of your nose for
> companies other than "the big three".
> 
> --

Welp, I don't know what every carrier's flat rate is.  I don't know that 
it is worth my time to find out.  I find life a little bit simpler and 
easier by having one person I can deal with consistently and at a 
competitive rate.

If I spent all my time proactively searching out the best rate among ALL 
possible vendors, I would be come a professional shopper and not a 
consumer.  Welp, my profession pays better than that so may that's why I 
don't.

Guess that puts me at the back of the class; all of the back.  Enjoying 
the sunshine and life while others keep searching for the absolute 
cheapest no matter the cost on life.

Paul :)
Technical Details
Message-ID: <31508B9A.3623@lawgate.byu.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <DnEJLA.Lnz@moraga.ness.com> <DnFJ9o.JIr@ranger.daytonoh.attgis.com> <Dno9nM.FDy@taranto.com> <4her64$s2p@news.iastate.edu> <mevansDnrCA3.258@netcom.com> <easton-0603961242170001@ppp026-sm2.sirius.com> <313F274D.4890@lawgate.byu.edu> <john-1003961608130001@bovine.ati.com> <314594DE.3F97@lawgate.byu.edu> <john-1203961911420001@bovine.ati.com> <314764ba.2478437@news.usit.net> <john-1903962059360001@bovine.ati.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 106595,a507389bf1e0496
X-Google-Attributes: gid106595,public
X-Google-Thread: 107518,2eb98a637ab39012
X-Google-Attributes: gid107518,public
From: Paul Masters <mastersp@lawgate.byu.edu>
Subject: Re: MCI vs Sprint
Date: 1996/03/20
Message-ID: <31508B9A.3623@lawgate.byu.edu>
X-Deja-AN: 143393504
references: <DnEJLA.Lnz@moraga.ness.com> <DnFJ9o.JIr@ranger.daytonoh.attgis.com> <Dno9nM.FDy@taranto.com> <4her64$s2p@news.iastate.edu> <mevansDnrCA3.258@netcom.com> <easton-0603961242170001@ppp026-sm2.sirius.com> <313F274D.4890@lawgate.byu.edu> <john-1003961608130001@bovine.ati.com> <314594DE.3F97@lawgate.byu.edu> <john-1203961911420001@bovine.ati.com> <314764ba.2478437@news.usit.net> <john-1903962059360001@bovine.ati.com>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Brigham Young University, Provo UT USA
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: misc.consumers,ba.consumers
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; I)