Re: MCI vs Sprint

Article View: misc.consumers

Article #6890

#6890

From: George Grapman
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 00:00

11 lines
1517 bytes

3961608130001@bovine.ati.com> <314594DE.3F97@lawgate.byu.edu> 
<john-1203961911420001@bovine.ati.com> <314764ba.2478437@news.usit.net>:
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)

   I just found out that some company which was subcontracting for AT&T 
placed an order with Pac Bell to move my service from MCI effective last 
week. Since that included one of the MCI free calling days I have notified 
PacBell that i will refuse to pay for calls on that day and will not pay 
any other charges which were higher than what my MCI bill would have 
been. I may even contest all the AT&T calls since paying them anything 
amounts to rewarding them for such activity.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <sfgeorgeDo8JsK.56o@netcom.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<DnEJLA.Lnz@moraga.ness.com> <DnFJ9o.JIr@ranger.daytonoh.attgis.com> <Dno9nM.FDy@taranto.com> <4her64$s2p@news.iastate.edu> <mevansDnrCA3.258@netcom.com> <easton-0603961242170001@ppp026-sm2.sirius.com> <313F274D.4890@lawgate.byu.edu> <john-100

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 106595,a507389bf1e0496
X-Google-Attributes: gid106595,public
X-Google-Thread: 107518,2eb98a637ab39012
X-Google-Attributes: gid107518,public
From: sfgeorge@netcom.com (George Grapman)
Subject: Re: MCI vs Sprint
Date: 1996/03/14
Message-ID: <sfgeorgeDo8JsK.56o@netcom.com>
X-Deja-AN: 142608384
sender: sfgeorge@netcom19.netcom.com
references: <DnEJLA.Lnz@moraga.ness.com> <DnFJ9o.JIr@ranger.daytonoh.attgis.com> <Dno9nM.FDy@taranto.com> <4her64$s2p@news.iastate.edu> <mevansDnrCA3.258@netcom.com> <easton-0603961242170001@ppp026-sm2.sirius.com> <313F274D.4890@lawgate.byu.edu> <john-100
followup-to: misc.consumers,ba.consumers
organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
newsgroups: misc.consumers,ba.consumers

Reply to Parent Message