Article View: misc.consumers
Article #7799Re: Home Shopping Network prices (jewelry - scam?)
From: Salim Ali
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 00:00
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 00:00
15 lines
1371 bytes
1371 bytes
In article h4d@panix3.panix.com, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) writes: >In article <4e5419$t3l@reader2.ix.netcom.com>, >Mildred Masten <mmasten@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>..... I have >>purchased several pieces of jewelry from the various channels and had >>them appraised for far higher amounts than I have paid. > >Did you ask the appraiser how much he'd buy it for? That's a much >more honest number than just asking for "appraisal" (which is often >high-balled for reasons that should be obvious). Now, why would the appraiser provide an inflated value? Salim
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4ebb1u$ec6@unet.net.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4e9a84$h4d@panix3.panix.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f529a,592dea2c265b02af X-Google-Attributes: gidf529a,public X-Google-Thread: 11474a,592dea2c265b02af X-Google-Attributes: gid11474a,public X-Google-Thread: 107e49,592dea2c265b02af X-Google-Attributes: gid107e49,public X-Google-Thread: 107518,592dea2c265b02af X-Google-Attributes: gid107518,public From: salim@net.com (Salim Ali) Subject: Re: Home Shopping Network prices (jewelry - scam?) Date: 1996/01/26 Message-ID: <4ebb1u$ec6@unet.net.com> X-Deja-AN: 136541120 distribution: world references: <4e9a84$h4d@panix3.panix.com> organization: Network Equipment Technologies reply-to: salim@net.com newsgroups: misc.consumers,alt.consumers.experiences,misc.consumers,biz.marketplace.discussion,rec.crafts.jewelry