🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: misc.consumers
Article #7823

Re: Per Minute Charges proposal to FCC by local phone companies.

#7823
From: krw
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 00:00
50 lines
3514 bytes
In <5dt8ul$q2b@imagine.convex.com>, jerryw@convex.com (Jerry Whelan) writes:
>In article <5dsorm$7l$1@news.iastate.edu>,
>Kurt Glaesemann <kurtg@iastate.edu> wrote:
>
>-} It's about time that people start paying for what they are using.  Using
>-} modems to connect to the internet costs the phone companies huge amounts of
>-} money because it's resulted in a huge surge in phone usage.
>
>Not all phone companies are experiencing these kinds of problems.  I
>believe BellSouth is one of the larger baby bells that is not complaining
>about congestion due to modem usage.  The reason?  Good planning.  If
>the reports about BellSouth are true, the problem here is not Internet
>users being subsidized by other kinds of phone users, it is baby bells
>who are guilty of poor management.

  Duh.  How are they going to go to the PSB and demand higher rates?  I
  think this is very poor planning!
>
>The local telephone companies that didn't have enough management foresight
>to anticipate the change in usage patterns and plan appropriately are
>the ones complaining that they need more money.  Many Internet users
>have purchased second phone lines for their modem usage, typically
>costing $60-70 to install and then another $20+ per month, that right
>there is a substantial amount of money that the local telcos are receiving.
>In fact, many people pay more for their second lines than they do for
>Internet access itself.

  Umm, let me see.  I pay about $28/month for my "basic" phone service.  I
  pay ~$20 for my internet access ans about another $25 for my local phone
  charges for my Internet time.  I think they are well compensated.  

  I would add a second line, but it is just too expensive!  I cannot see
  another $50/mo for a phone line.
>
>Furthermore, if the local telcos had not mishandled the deployment of
>ISDN by insisting on such outrageous pricing that most people couldn't
>afford to buy it, they would not be in this predicament right now
>either. 

  Please, tell it to someone in the real world.  ISDN just does not
  exist here.  As much as I hate our cable company, I'm rooting for
  them to figure out how to din Inet.  They are about as bad as NYNEX
 so who knows.

  <The rest snipped - all agreed - except the Telcos could care less
  about thechnology or performance.  They want to milk the investment.
  Bring on the competition!>
----
  Keith R. Williams
Technical Details
Message-ID: <5du2u8$1n2o$1@news-s01.ca.us.ibm.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <855704873.24905@dejanews.com> <5dsorm$7l$1@news.iastate.edu> <5dt8ul$q2b@imagine.convex.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f917c,c07f83377f6a4d06
X-Google-Attributes: gidf917c,public
X-Google-Thread: 11200d,c07f83377f6a4d06
X-Google-Attributes: gid11200d,public
X-Google-Thread: 100579,c07f83377f6a4d06
X-Google-Attributes: gid100579,public
X-Google-Thread: 107518,c07f83377f6a4d06
X-Google-Attributes: gid107518,public
X-Google-Thread: 103e83,c07f83377f6a4d06
X-Google-Attributes: gid103e83,public
X-Google-Thread: f80a2,c07f83377f6a4d06
X-Google-Attributes: gidf80a2,public
X-Google-Thread: 10f265,c07f83377f6a4d06
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f265,public
From: krw@ibm.net
Subject: Re: Per Minute Charges proposal to FCC by local phone companies.
Date: 1997/02/13
Message-ID: <5du2u8$1n2o$1@news-s01.ca.us.ibm.net>
X-Deja-AN: 218420405
References: <855704873.24905@dejanews.com> <5dsorm$7l$1@news.iastate.edu> <5dt8ul$q2b@imagine.convex.com>
Reply-To: krw@ibm.net
Newsgroups: misc.consumers,alt.business.misc,alt.business,misc.entrepreneurs,biz.marketplace.international,biz.marketplace,dfw.internet.providers