Re: Should this man have been convicted?

Article View: misc.consumers

Article #8549

#8549

From: Dissident
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 05:10

28 lines
2525 bytes

Brian Gordon wrote:
> In article <5yY%9.5418$Xz4.339468@news2.west.cox.net>,
> Dave Lister  <retsildivad33@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>
>>12 jurors, and not one with the common sense God gave an ant.
>>
> 
> 
> They all did their duty -- decided the case on the facts in evidence, rather
> than some "outside the court" secret information.  That's how the jury
> system is supposed to work.
> 
> 
>>Can Grey Davis, who supported the medical marijuana law in CA pardon him?
>>
> 
> 
> What jurisdiction does a State Governor have in a conviction in a Federal
> Court for violation os a Federal Law?  As I have heard a US Attorney ask, even
> if CA passes a law saying bank robbery is not a crime, the Federal law still
> stands.
> 
> We need to change Federal law, not harass Federal jurors who did their sworn
> duty.

I intend to declare that the next federal LEO killed anywhere
in the world deserved it as a result of this conviction.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3E449160.1060403@7600.net>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn13feed!wn12feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!sccrnsc02.POSTED!not-for-mail

References: <3E4046EB.8C37D94B@nospam.com> <5yY%9.5418$Xz4.339468@news2.west.cox.net> <b1upep$q73$1@panix3.panix.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,b930db7c113fc78e
X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public
X-Google-Thread: 10fa57,b930db7c113fc78e
X-Google-Attributes: gid10fa57,public
X-Google-Thread: f4552,b930db7c113fc78e
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4552,public
X-Google-Thread: 107518,b930db7c113fc78e
X-Google-Attributes: gid107518,public
X-Google-Thread: f4d80,b930db7c113fc78e
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d80,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-07 21:10:49 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn13feed!wn12feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!sccrnsc02.POSTED!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3E449160.1060403@7600.net>
From: Dissident <qqqq@7600.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: misc.consumers,alt.law-enforcement,sci.med.pharmacy,ca.general,ok.general
Subject: Re: Should this man have been convicted?
References: <3E4046EB.8C37D94B@nospam.com> <5yY%9.5418$Xz4.339468@news2.west.cox.net> <b1upep$q73$1@panix3.panix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 29
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.234.118.36
X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com
X-Trace: sccrnsc02 1044681048 12.234.118.36 (Sat, 08 Feb 2003 05:10:48 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 05:10:48 GMT
Organization: AT&T Broadband
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 05:10:48 GMT

Reply to Parent Message