🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: misc.consumers
Article #8570

Re: Should this man have been convicted?

#8570
From: Dave Lister
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 00:04
88 lines
4709 bytes

12 jurors, and not one with the common sense God gave an ant.

Can Grey Davis, who supported the medical marijuana law in CA pardon him?

Allison Trent <atrent@nospam.com> wrote in 
news:3E4046EB.8C37D94B@nospam.com:

> 
> Jurors Regret Convicting Pot Grower  
>                          
> February 4, 2003 03:58 PM EST  
>                          
> SAN FRANCISCO - Jurors who convicted a man of cultivating 
> marijuana and other federal drug charges say they would have 
> acquitted him had they been told he was growing it for medical 
> purposes for the city of Oakland. 
> 
> "I feel like I made the biggest mistake in my life," juror 
> Marney Craig said. "We convicted a man who is not a criminal." 
> 
> Other jurors reached Monday agreed and planned to write to 
> Ed Rosenthal to apologize. 
> 
> Rosenthal, 58, the self-described "Guru of Ganja," faces up 
> to 85 years in prison when he is sentenced June 4. In a 
> courtroom crowded with medical marijuana advocates wearing 
> "Free Ed" buttons, a federal judge decided Tuesday that 
> Rosenthal can remain free until then. 
> 
> After a two-week trial, the 12-member jury unanimously 
> concluded Friday that Rosenthal was growing more than 100 
> plants, conspired to cultivate marijuana, and maintained an 
> Oakland warehouse for a growing operation. He was portrayed 
> as a major drug manufacturer and put on little defense. 
> 
> The jury was not told that Rosenthal was acting as an agent 
> of Oakland's medical marijuana program, an outgrowth of a 
> 1996 medical marijuana initiative approved by California's 
> voters that conflicts with federal law. 
> 
> "I really feel manipulated in a way," juror Pam Klarkowsky 
> said. "Had I known that information, there is no way I could 
> have found that man guilty." 
> 
> Rosenthal's defense repeatedly tried to call witnesses to 
> testify that he was growing marijuana for medical use. The 
> judge denied those requests and was backed up twice during 
> the trial by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. 
> 
> Legal experts said U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer had 
> federal precedent on his side. 
> 
> "A bank robber is not allowed a defense that he was stealing 
> money for his starving children, even if he was," said Rory 
> Little, a Hastings College of the Law professor. 
> 
> Also backing Breyer, experts say, was a ruling by the U.S. 
> Supreme Court two years ago prohibiting advocates for the 
> sick and dying from doling out marijuana to those with a 
> doctor's recommendation. That decision prompted raids on 
> medical marijuana growing operations throughout California. 
> 
> In addition, the federal government does not recognize 
> medical marijuana laws in nine states that have them. 
> 
> Jury foreman Charles Sackett said he hopes Rosenthal's case is
> overturned on appeal. 
> 
> "Some of us jurors are upset about the way the trial was 
> conducted. ... I would have liked to have been given the 
> opportunity to decide with all the evidence." 
> ---------------------------------------------
> 



-- 
Oh, to have a President with a 75+ IQ instead of GW Bush,
who says:

"I'm gonna talk about the ideal world, Chris. I've
read, I understand reality. If you're asking me
as the president, would I understand reality, I do."

"...when I put my hand on the Bible, I will
swear to not, to uphold the laws of the land"
Technical Details
Message-ID: <5yY%9.5418$Xz4.339468@news2.west.cox.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!news-xfer.cox.net!p01!news2.west.cox.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
References: <3E4046EB.8C37D94B@nospam.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,b930db7c113fc78e
X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public
X-Google-Thread: 107518,b930db7c113fc78e
X-Google-Attributes: gid107518,public
X-Google-Thread: f4552,b930db7c113fc78e
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4552,public
X-Google-Thread: f4d80,b930db7c113fc78e
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d80,public
X-Google-Thread: 10fa57,b930db7c113fc78e
X-Google-Attributes: gid10fa57,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-04 16:06:14 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!news-xfer.cox.net!p01!news2.west.cox.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: misc.consumers,alt.law-enforcement,sci.med.pharmacy,ca.general,ok.general
Subject: Re: Should this man have been convicted?
From: Dave Lister <retsildivad33@hotmail.com>
References: <3E4046EB.8C37D94B@nospam.com>
Organization: Red Dwarf
User-Agent: Xnews/L5
Lines: 89
Message-ID: <5yY%9.5418$Xz4.339468@news2.west.cox.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 00:04:17 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.7.56.33
X-Complaints-To: abuse@cox.net
X-Trace: news2.west.cox.net 1044403457 68.7.56.33 (Tue, 04 Feb 2003 19:04:17 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 19:04:17 EST