Article View: misc.consumers
Article #9014Re: Chicken of the Sea Tuna Horrible
From: Albert Silverman
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1998 00:00
24 lines
1651 bytes
1651 bytes
In article <6q71h2$t5r$1@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu>, Deborah Stevenson <stevenso@alexia.lis.uiuc.edu> wrote: >In <12855-35C64474-20@newsd-141.iap.bryant.webtv.net> rick4433@webtv.net >(eric) writes: > >>chunk light was terrible .they have really gone down hill. > >Cook's Illustrated did a blind taste-testing of commercial tunas and >found that most chunk lights didn't fall within their acceptable range. >(Geisha was the only brand that did.) Stick to solid white--they liked >Starkist best of that lot, FWIW, and Chicken of the Sea 3rd. From my continuous taste testing, I find that Bumblebee solid white tuna seems to be the best of the lot (better than Star-Kist, in my estimation), while Bumblebee chunk light tuna sees to be the WORST of the lot, within this quality category. It "beats" Chicken of the Sea (on a perverse quality scale) by a considerable margin. Go figure. > >Deborah Stevenson >(stevenso@alexia.lis.uiuc.edu) >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<slvrmnEx6M15.3Fx@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<12855-35C64474-20@newsd-141.iap.bryant.webtv.net> <6q71h2$t5r$1@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 107518,8c4c1172676372da X-Google-Attributes: gid107518,public X-Google-Thread: 115ce9,8c4c1172676372da X-Google-Attributes: gid115ce9,public X-Google-Thread: 10bf60,8c4c1172676372da X-Google-Attributes: gid10bf60,public From: slvrmn@netcom.com (Albert Silverman) Subject: Re: Chicken of the Sea Tuna Horrible Date: 1998/08/04 Message-ID: <slvrmnEx6M15.3Fx@netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 377929480 Sender: slvrmn@netcom10.netcom.com References: <12855-35C64474-20@newsd-141.iap.bryant.webtv.net> <6q71h2$t5r$1@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> Organization: home in La Mesa, California Newsgroups: misc.consumers,la.eats,chi.eats