🚀 go-pugleaf

krw wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> krw wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> krw wrote
>>>>> info_at_1-script_dot_com@foo.com (spendwize.com) wrote

>>>>>> It may be "illegal" - I don't know - but its actually a
>>>>>> protection for you - there's so much credit card fraud these
>>>>>> days, I'd rather the clerks make sure I am whoI say I am.

>>>>> It's a protection for *them*.

>>>> Its protection for both partys.

>>> Wrong, as usual, Ron.

>> How odd that you couldnt substantiate your claim.

> That you're wrong, Ronnie?

Both of the claims above, fuckwit.

<reams of your juvenile shit any 2 year old could leave for dead flushed where it belongs>

> The fact is that it is *NO* protection for you

Obvious lie if your card is stolen.

> and somewhat of a risk giving anyone any information.

You aint giving anyone any information if they just check that you are who you say you are, fuckwit.

>>>>> You're not protected by giving the cashier even more information about you.

>>>> Wrong.

>>> No Ron.  You're wrong, as usual.

>> How odd that you couldnt substantiate your claim.


<reams of your juvenile shit any 2 year old could leave for dead flushed where it belongs>

>>>> You're protected by not having a stolen card used. That avoids
>>>> having to have a transaction using your stolen card reversed and
>>>> ultimately that keeps the costs down and so you pay less in card
>>>> costs overall if everyone does that.

>>> Dumb as a stump, too.

>> Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

> Good thing I don't have to bullshit about this one, huh, Ronnie.

Obvious lie.

>>>>> That said, much too much is made about this here.

>> Corse you never ever do anything like that yourself, eh ?


<reams of your juvenile shit any 2 year old could leave for dead flushed where it belongs>