Article View: misc.consumers
Article #9441Re: Should Md. Ban Cell phones in cars?
From: The Real Bev
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 21:26
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 21:26
34 lines
3342 bytes
3342 bytes
RickW wrote:
>
> "Roy Shroyer" <badcam@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > That said, I believe that if there is conclusive proof that the person at
> > > > fault in the accident was talking on the cellphone when the accident
> > > > occurred, that there should be severe penalites added, akin to the penalites
> > > > assigned when the driver at fault is drunk.
In addition: similar penalties for driving while adjusting the radio,
eating, shaving, yelling at your dog/child, putting on makeup, reading,
etc.? That's like punishing people for having bad thoughts even though
they haven't actually done anything illegal or immoral.
> > I think you misunderstood. I don't want more laws governing my actions. I
> > feel that the individual should be held accountable for his actions, however.
>
> Sorry, I'm confused. First you said you'd like to see severe penalties
> added, and now you're saying you don't want more laws governing
> your actions.. But I think we agree the answer is to educate people
> and promote personal responsibility, not pass more stupid laws.
Is there a ticketable category for "unsafe driving while not in control"?
Evidence might be weaving, inappropriate speed or lane change, striking
persons or objects with the vehicle, etc.
I don't think there's any way of educating the irresponsible, the best you
can do is slap them silly or put them where they can't hurt anyone.
--
Cheers,
Bev
================================================================
"Everything sucks; reverse the wires and everything will blow."
-- Desert Ed
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3E418187.B5CB814@myrealbox.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!news-feed1.de1.concert.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!206.225.65.165!not-for-mailReferences:
<3E40C784.881CE850@nospam.com> <b1r3nf$4ur$1@emac1.ocs.lsu.edu> <b1r6jt$161c1m$1@ID-82690.news.dfncis.de> <b1r8hk$o46$1@emac1.ocs.lsu.edu> <b1raa4$16fm81$1@ID-82690.news.dfncis.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10774d,53c72126a599145a X-Google-Attributes: gid10774d,public X-Google-Thread: 108b95,53c72126a599145a X-Google-Attributes: gid108b95,public X-Google-Thread: 107518,53c72126a599145a X-Google-Attributes: gid107518,public X-Google-Thread: 11299e,53c72126a599145a X-Google-Attributes: gid11299e,public X-Google-Thread: 1011e5,53c72126a599145a X-Google-Attributes: gid1011e5,public X-Google-Thread: 10e16d,53c72126a599145a X-Google-Attributes: gid10e16d,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-05 13:28:02 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!news-feed1.de1.concert.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!206.225.65.165!not-for-mail From: The Real Bev <bashley@myrealbox.com> Newsgroups: misc.consumers,rec.autos.driving,alt.cellular,md.general,alt.law-enforcement.traffic,dc.driving Subject: Re: Should Md. Ban Cell phones in cars? Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 13:26:31 -0800 Organization: The Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy Lines: 34 Message-ID: <3E418187.B5CB814@myrealbox.com> References: <3E40C784.881CE850@nospam.com> <b1r3nf$4ur$1@emac1.ocs.lsu.edu> <b1r6jt$161c1m$1@ID-82690.news.dfncis.de> <b1r8hk$o46$1@emac1.ocs.lsu.edu> <b1raa4$16fm81$1@ID-82690.news.dfncis.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.225.65.165 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1044480386 40234344 206.225.65.165 (16 [6883]) X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4 i686) X-Accept-Language: en