Article View: misc.consumers
Article #9487Re: Yes.
From: James Knott
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 11:43
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 11:43
17 lines
2186 bytes
2186 bytes
MistressSycamore wrote: >> Cell phone use in cars should be banned. > > NO, because there are such things as emergencies ( and I don't mean JUST > breaking down, etc.). > A few years ago, while driving to work, I saw a cab driver hitting a woman. I phoned the police and they asked me to follow him as best I could, while I remained on the phone to them. -- Fundamentalism is fundamentally wrong. To reply to this message, replace everything to the left of "@" with james.knott.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<y%o4a.22$b8v1.8@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-09!supernews.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cyclone.bc.net!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com!news03.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com!news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<3E40C784.881CE850@nospam.com> <b1r0vt0cqk@enews1.newsguy.com> <WWh0a.232042$ej1.63889@news02.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com> <seG2a.8939$in1.518637@twister.austin.rr.com> <3E5120C2.43FDC2F2@none.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10774d,53c72126a599145a X-Google-Attributes: gid10774d,public X-Google-Thread: 10e16d,53c72126a599145a X-Google-Attributes: gid10e16d,public X-Google-Thread: 107518,53c72126a599145a X-Google-Attributes: gid107518,public X-Google-Thread: 11299e,53c72126a599145a X-Google-Attributes: gid11299e,public X-Google-Thread: 108b95,53c72126a599145a X-Google-Attributes: gid108b95,public X-Google-Thread: 1011e5,53c72126a599145a X-Google-Attributes: gid1011e5,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-18 03:44:03 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-09!supernews.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cyclone.bc.net!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com!news03.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com!news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: James Knott <bit_bucket@rogers.com> Subject: Re: Yes. Newsgroups: misc.consumers,rec.autos.driving,alt.cellular,md.general,alt.law-enforcement.traffic,dc.driving References: <3E40C784.881CE850@nospam.com> <b1r0vt0cqk@enews1.newsguy.com> <WWh0a.232042$ej1.63889@news02.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com> <seG2a.8939$in1.518637@twister.austin.rr.com> <3E5120C2.43FDC2F2@none.com> Lines: 17 User-Agent: KNode/0.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Message-ID: <y%o4a.22$b8v1.8@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 11:43:26 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.157.224.139 X-Complaints-To: abuse@rogers.com X-Trace: news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com 1045568606 24.157.224.139 (Tue, 18 Feb 2003 06:43:26 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 06:43:26 EST