Article View: misc.consumers
Article #9489Re: Yes.
From: Bob Ward
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 03:19
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 03:19
39 lines
2982 bytes
2982 bytes
On 20 Feb 2003 16:20:43 -0800, bear_Trucker_lvr@yahoo.com (Bear Trucker Lvr) wrote: >And i think this study is a little biased. they only used a handful >of people in this test, instead of the thousands they should have for >true results. > In other words, they should keep doing the study until their findings agree with YOUR opinion? >I always use a handsfree when driving. that way i can concentrate on >the road (visual indicators) not holding a block of silicon and >plastic to my face. > You are still distracted by virtue of the fact that you are carrying on a conversation with someone not present in the car. Didn't you bother to read the study you are arguing against? > >Bob Ward <bob.ward@verizon.net> wrote in message news:<0v2r4v48s1443n4kquu7aq9rro9vvs8551@4ax.com>... >> On 14 Feb 2003 11:57:03 -0800, sams@freeddns.org (sams) wrote: >> >> >> > Cell phone use in cars should be banned. >> >I dont mind as long as its used hands free. >> >Its like talking to a passenger. >> > >> >Sam. >> >> >> Recent studies indicate that this is not the case >> >> http://www.nsc.org/library/shelf/inincell.htm -- The time for action is past! NOW is the time for the senseless bickering
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6j6b5v01d3udc1hbp94osks1k39s4022vr@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!lsanca1-ar13-4-60-142-233.lsanca1.dsl-verizon.NET!not-for-mailReferences:
<3E40C784.881CE850@nospam.com> <b1r0vt0cqk@enews1.newsguy.com> <WWh0a.232042$ej1.63889@news02.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com> <seG2a.8939$in1.518637@twister.austin.rr.com> <3E4BEF6D.D981BFF3@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> <4d010e73.0302141157.26f8637d@posting.google.com> <0v2r4v48s1443n4kquu7aq9rro9vvs8551@4ax.com> <61d45c9d.0302201620.51c4cd65@posting.google.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10774d,53c72126a599145a X-Google-Attributes: gid10774d,public X-Google-Thread: 10e16d,53c72126a599145a X-Google-Attributes: gid10e16d,public X-Google-Thread: 1011e5,53c72126a599145a X-Google-Attributes: gid1011e5,public X-Google-Thread: 107518,53c72126a599145a X-Google-Attributes: gid107518,public X-Google-Thread: 11299e,53c72126a599145a X-Google-Attributes: gid11299e,public X-Google-Thread: 108b95,53c72126a599145a X-Google-Attributes: gid108b95,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-20 19:19:45 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!lsanca1-ar13-4-60-142-233.lsanca1.dsl-verizon.NET!not-for-mail From: Bob Ward <bob.ward@verizon.net> Newsgroups: misc.consumers,rec.autos.driving,alt.cellular,md.general,alt.law-enforcement.traffic,dc.driving Subject: Re: Yes. Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 19:19:43 -0800 Lines: 39 Message-ID: <6j6b5v01d3udc1hbp94osks1k39s4022vr@4ax.com> References: <3E40C784.881CE850@nospam.com> <b1r0vt0cqk@enews1.newsguy.com> <WWh0a.232042$ej1.63889@news02.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com> <seG2a.8939$in1.518637@twister.austin.rr.com> <3E4BEF6D.D981BFF3@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> <4d010e73.0302141157.26f8637d@posting.google.com> <0v2r4v48s1443n4kquu7aq9rro9vvs8551@4ax.com> <61d45c9d.0302201620.51c4cd65@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lsanca1-ar13-4-60-142-233.lsanca1.dsl-verizon.net (4.60.142.233) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1045797574 52596820 4.60.142.233 (16 [66749]) X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.92/32.572