🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: misc.consumers
Article #9571

Re: SUVs are rollover risks and prone fatal accidents! (NOT)

#9571
From: cameron taylor
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 02:23
47 lines
3436 bytes
Only you americans seem to be having these problems.
Stop being a bunch of girls!!! Harden up. Learn to drive properly and to
the conditions!

John Henry wrote:
> 
> Puh-Leeeze.
> 
> Ok, morons, drivers ed, road conditions aside, lets take two vehicles going
> down a deserted, smooth airport runway at 65mph, dry sunny warm day.  Now yank
> the wheel hard left and hold it.
> 
> Anyone care to argue about which one rolls over and which one doesn't?
> (please provide your test data in .mov or .avi format)
> 
> THAT is the sole basis of the Gov's ratings.
> 
> Its physics folks.  You can be the biggest, bestest SUV fan in the world, but
> physics still applies to you.
> 
> (BTW, I saw a Blazer to exactly the scenario above {interstate, not runway
> though}.  Didn't hit any other vehicle, rolled 3 times, and end over'ed
> twice.  Driver wasn't wearing a seatbelt and left the vehicle without use of
> either door)
> 
> Scott Aleckson wrote:
> 
> > > SUVs are rollover risks...
> >
> > Only if you drive like a complete moron.  After 10 years in the
> > fire/rescue/ems biz, I can personally say that I've seen many times more
> > rollovers involving cars than those involving SUVs.  The fact is, *ANY*
> > vehicle can roll over if it is not driven properly.  When people drive
> > appropriate to the vehicle and road conditions, then *NO* vehicle has a
> > measurable risk of either rollover or being prone to fatal accidents.  And
> > that is indisputable.  If you anti-SUV folks would put as much effort into
> > getting proper driver's education back into the schools we might get
> > somewhere.
> >
> > [Sorry for feeding the troll- it was a moment of weakness]
> 
> --
> John Henry
> ---------------
> Visit the "BugShop" at http://www.geocities.com/thebugshop/
> 
> "Stupidity really should be more painful."
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3A5FBC3C.2B1DFFF1@xtra.co.nz>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!freenix!news-hog.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!enews.sgi.com!news.xtra.co.nz!not-for-mail
References: <3A5BDEF3.72A252E@nospam.com> <3A5BF2B8.86F48EB9@alaska.net> <3A5CA7F8.96672472@sprintmail.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10da7e,4629000db8fe3b1e
X-Google-Attributes: gid10da7e,public
X-Google-Thread: 11299e,4629000db8fe3b1e
X-Google-Attributes: gid11299e,public
X-Google-Thread: 11297d,4629000db8fe3b1e
X-Google-Attributes: gid11297d,public
X-Google-Thread: 107518,4629000db8fe3b1e
X-Google-Attributes: gid107518,public
X-Google-Thread: 10e16d,4629000db8fe3b1e
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e16d,public
X-Google-Thread: 1011e5,4629000db8fe3b1e
X-Google-Attributes: gid1011e5,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-12 18:24:04 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!freenix!news-hog.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!enews.sgi.com!news.xtra.co.nz!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3A5FBC3C.2B1DFFF1@xtra.co.nz>
From: cameron taylor <modify@xtra.co.nz>
Reply-To: modify@xtra.co.nz
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,en-GB,en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: misc.consumers,rec.autos.driving,dc.driving,rec.autos.4x4,alt.law-enforcement.traffic,alt.med.ems
Subject: Re: SUVs are rollover risks and prone fatal accidents! (NOT)
References: <3A5BDEF3.72A252E@nospam.com> <3A5BF2B8.86F48EB9@alaska.net> <3A5CA7F8.96672472@sprintmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 47
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 15:23:56 +1300
NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.27.179.162
X-Complaints-To: newsadmin@xtra.co.nz
X-Trace: news.xtra.co.nz 979352355 202.27.179.162 (Sat, 13 Jan 2001 15:19:15 NZDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 15:19:15 NZDT
Organization: Xtra