🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: misc.consumers
Article #9597

Re: SUVs are rollover risks and prone fatal accidents! (NOT)

#9597
From: David Hillman
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 16:50
32 lines
2917 bytes
In article <slrn95pof7.1ep.standard@min.net>,
Joseph Huesmann <standard@min.net> wrote:
>Just took a look at the Road America map.  5 and 8 look pretty sharp.  But 
>I doubt you took both of those turns at 65 mph and yanking the wheel sharp 
>left.  You probably braked, hit the outside and apexed at the inside.

   With all due respect to C.R., because I know he's been through 5 and 8
   many more times that I have, I think he picked the wrong corner(s) to
   illustrate his point.

   First of all, a single-occupant LHD vehicle is more likely to roll in
   a right-hand turn, than a left; so despite the original poster specifying
   'left', a right-hand sweeper is really the test-case we're looking for.

   Lo and behold, 9 aka the carousel, is a 180 degree right-hand sweeper.

   It is wide enough that Champ cars take it at around 150mph, and I 
   don't believe many street cars need to brake on entry.  Amazingly,
   AFAIK, no car has gone flipping off into the scenery.

   Not even in this AVI; http://www.roadamerica.com/video/tracktour.avi

   Also, to the original poster who believes cars will jump onto their
   roof in this situation, can you please describe for us how maximum
   lateral acceleration is tested?  ( You know, the .XX g's you always
   see in magazines. )

   Thanks in advance.

--
 D a v i d  H i l l m a n
 nma, scca, scscc, imoc
Technical Details
Message-ID: <93ko86$a4e$1@bob.news.rcn.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.iac.net!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!news-peer.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!howland.erols.net!feed2.news.rcn.net!feed1.news.rcn.net!rcn!not-for-mail
References: <3A5BDEF3.72A252E@nospam.com> <3A5D3D1B.7C39744C@bcstec.ca.boeing.com> <RS476.260$Fw4.78985@homer.alpha.net> <slrn95pof7.1ep.standard@min.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1011e5,4629000db8fe3b1e
X-Google-Attributes: gid1011e5,public
X-Google-Thread: 11299e,4629000db8fe3b1e
X-Google-Attributes: gid11299e,public
X-Google-Thread: 107518,4629000db8fe3b1e
X-Google-Attributes: gid107518,public
X-Google-Thread: 10da7e,4629000db8fe3b1e
X-Google-Attributes: gid10da7e,public
X-Google-Thread: 10e16d,4629000db8fe3b1e
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e16d,public
X-Google-Thread: 11297d,4629000db8fe3b1e
X-Google-Attributes: gid11297d,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-11 08:56:51 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.iac.net!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!news-peer.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!howland.erols.net!feed2.news.rcn.net!feed1.news.rcn.net!rcn!not-for-mail
From: hillman@enteract.com (David Hillman)
Newsgroups: misc.consumers,rec.autos.driving,dc.driving,rec.autos.4x4,alt.law-enforcement.traffic,alt.med.ems
Subject: Re: SUVs are rollover risks and prone fatal accidents! (NOT)
Date: 11 Jan 2001 16:50:14 GMT
Organization: Hillman, Incorporated
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <93ko86$a4e$1@bob.news.rcn.net>
References: <3A5BDEF3.72A252E@nospam.com> <3A5D3D1B.7C39744C@bcstec.ca.boeing.com> <RS476.260$Fw4.78985@homer.alpha.net> <slrn95pof7.1ep.standard@min.net>
X-Trace: UmFuZG9tSVbAncMLNW8G+Z7NJdjoBKgojANeG7cwoT6n7aqTx6NZqnh3Pdvqjq/r
X-Complaints-To: abuse@rcn.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Jan 2001 16:50:14 GMT
X-Newsreader:  trn 4.0-test72 (19 April 1999)