Article View: misc.consumers
Article #9609Re: Sitting up Higher ( was Re: SUVs are rollover risks and prone fatal accidents! (NOT) )
From: nmoberg
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 13:11
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 13:11
30 lines
3198 bytes
3198 bytes
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001 12:28:18 GMT, standard@min.net (Joseph Huesmann) wrote: >In article <3a5e862e.1651835@news.mindspring.com>, Andy Chi wrote: >>On 11 Jan 2001 17:09:41 GMT, hillman@enteract.com (David Hillman) >>wrote: >> >>>In article <X1l76.253610$U46.8046899@news1.sttls1.wa.home.com>, >>>Bob <bobnospam@seattleoffice.com> wrote: >>>>Interestingly, no one yet has mentioned that you can see much better what is >>>>happening ahead when you are sitting higher. Thus, the possibility of >>>>avoiding 'avoidance manuevers" is better. I pay attention to what is >> >>With those lousy brakes, you had BETTER be able to see WAY WAY ahead >>of you. Cadillac Escalade has DRUM REARS for Pete's sake! And they are >>not the exception in the SUV world. >> >>Yes, those lousy brakes effectively cancel out the whatever vantage >>advantage that these POS trucks have over regular passenger cars. It's >>time we slap gas guzzler tax on these things like they have been doing >>to CARS that get shitty mileage. > >Rear brakes do very little braking, anyway. The only advantage discs have >over drums is that they are less fade-prone. Why does fade prone mean anything if the rears do very little real braking? Rear drums do enough to make a difference. Just try a set of drums in the mountains on a warm day. Particularly on a bloated whale like a Cadillac Escalade.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<bd0u5t8cnvufms31e5f4f1ctg86ti7jqob@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.iac.net!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!telocity-west!TELOCITY!newsrump.sjc.telocity.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<3A5BDEF3.72A252E@nospam.com> <3A5BF2B8.86F48EB9@alaska.net> <slrn95qbid.pf5.eric@ehome.inhouse> <X1l76.253610$U46.8046899@news1.sttls1.wa.home.com> <93kpcl$ebv$1@bob.news.rcn.net> <3a5e862e.1651835@news.mindspring.com> <slrn95tu2r.j0m.standard@min.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 11299e,4629000db8fe3b1e X-Google-Attributes: gid11299e,public X-Google-Thread: 10da7e,4629000db8fe3b1e X-Google-Attributes: gid10da7e,public X-Google-Thread: 1011e5,4629000db8fe3b1e X-Google-Attributes: gid1011e5,public X-Google-Thread: 11297d,4629000db8fe3b1e X-Google-Attributes: gid11297d,public X-Google-Thread: 107518,4629000db8fe3b1e X-Google-Attributes: gid107518,public X-Google-Thread: 10e16d,4629000db8fe3b1e X-Google-Attributes: gid10e16d,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-12 05:14:38 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.iac.net!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!telocity-west!TELOCITY!newsrump.sjc.telocity.net!not-for-mail From: nmoberg <nmoberg@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: misc.consumers,rec.autos.driving,dc.driving,rec.autos.4x4,alt.law-enforcement.traffic,alt.med.ems Subject: Re: Sitting up Higher ( was Re: SUVs are rollover risks and prone fatal accidents! (NOT) ) Message-ID: <bd0u5t8cnvufms31e5f4f1ctg86ti7jqob@4ax.com> References: <3A5BDEF3.72A252E@nospam.com> <3A5BF2B8.86F48EB9@alaska.net> <slrn95qbid.pf5.eric@ehome.inhouse> <X1l76.253610$U46.8046899@news1.sttls1.wa.home.com> <93kpcl$ebv$1@bob.news.rcn.net> <3a5e862e.1651835@news.mindspring.com> <slrn95tu2r.j0m.standard@min.net> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 36 X-Trace: MzYgTm9BdXRoVXNlciBURUxPQ0lUWS1SRUFERVJTIDIxNi4yMjcuMTEuMjA5ICBGcmksIDEyIEph!biAyMDAxIDA1OjExOjQ4IFBTVA== X-Abuse-Info: Please forward ALL headers when reporting abuse. X-Complaints-To: abuse@telocity.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 05:11:48 PST Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 07:11:41 -0600