Article View: misc.creativity
Article #28Good Processing vs. Good Thinking
From: Walter Derzko
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 1996 00:00
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 1996 00:00
84 lines
5050 bytes
5050 bytes
The following article (see exerpts below) appeared in the weekend edition (April 20) of the Financial Post newspaper-published in Toronto, on page 31 in a special report titled "The CEO" ====================================================================== "Good process no substitute for good thinking" -------------------------------------------- by Johanna Powell/FP In the 1950s and '60s, CEOs focused on maintaining profits and the status quo. The came total quality management, with its focus on faster, better and cheaper. Now, CEOs have downsized, re-engineered and restructured their companies, and they are moving into a new era where the focus is not on just quality, but also on significant improvements in the way their companies operate. This will require a new way of thinking, says Walter Derzko, head of Walter Derzko & Associates and a strong proponent of lateral creative thinking, a technique designed to produce innovative ideas. Companies have been so tied up with downsizing, Derzko says, that very few people have thought about the future. They have squeezed as much as they can out of downsizing, but this has not brought them increased market share or greater profits. "Good process isn't a substitute for good thinking." he says."It is rare to get breakthrough ideas." This is where lateral or creative thinking comes into play. To illustrate, Derzko describes a manufacturer that switched from military production to making automotive breaks. The manufacturer challenged traditional thinking and began looking at ways of improving breaking by using the accelerator pedal. The first step in emergency breaking is removing the foot from the gas, which led to the idea that the break lights could go on when the driver's foot quickly leaves the accelerator. This would give drivers behind a fraction of a second more notice and an added chance to avoid a rear-end pileup. "As the complexity of the world and the number of choices grows, thinking becomes increasingly important. Without thinking, students and employees fear ambiguity." Derzko says. .....[snip].... Derzko says the traditional corporate organization often discourages creative thinking, reducing variation in thinking through rules and human resources practices.Traditionally, companies have wanted to increase convergent thinking, so everyone in the firm would be thinking along the same line. Now, he says, executives complain that employees and students aren't creative enough. But creative thinking is a practical skill that can be learned, the same way other skills, such as mathematics, are taught, practised and applied." In fact, it is often taught in the gifted or enriched programs in elementary school, based on the concepts of Edward de Bono, author of Teach Yourself to Think. De Bono uses a systematic approach to problem-solving that is designed to take the confusion out of thinking about difficult issues. Derzko teaches creative thinking courses at the college and university level. He is also the driving force behind the Creativity Consortium, a group of like-minded people from all walks of life, ranging from administrators at large corporations, such as Royal Bank and Bell Canada,to artists, entertainers and entrepreneurs. The group, which Derzko says is the oldest thinking club in Canada (and North America, as well), started meeting in 1992 to practise lateral creative thinking skills, the same way Toastmasters groups meet to practise public speaking. ======================================================================== For more information on the Creativity Consortium and virtual membership, visit our web page http://www.itrc.on.ca/CreativityConsortium/ or send an email to wd@itrc.on.ca
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4lk8hp$i8s@epas.utoronto.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f94db,bc66eed0c7d16e8c,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf94db,public X-Google-Thread: f504b,bc66eed0c7d16e8c,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf504b,public X-Google-Thread: 1136fc,bc66eed0c7d16e8c,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1136fc,public X-Google-Thread: 10526d,bc66eed0c7d16e8c,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10526d,public X-Google-Thread: fab5e,bc66eed0c7d16e8c,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfab5e,public X-Google-Thread: 1159e4,bc66eed0c7d16e8c,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1159e4,public X-Google-Thread: 10643c,bc66eed0c7d16e8c,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10643c,public X-Google-Thread: 10ca6d,bc66eed0c7d16e8c,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10ca6d,public From: wderzko@epas.utoronto.ca (Walter Derzko) Subject: Good Processing vs. Good Thinking Date: 1996/04/23 Message-ID: <4lk8hp$i8s@epas.utoronto.ca> X-Deja-AN: 151139995 organization: University of Toronto -- EPAS keywords: lateral thinking, Creativity Consortium newsgroups: misc.creativity,can.general,biz.general,misc.industry.quality,alt.society.futures,alt.thinking,alt.wired,tor.general,alt.org.toastmasters,ont.events,alt.inventors,alt.brain, summary: Article in Financial Post