🚀 go-pugleaf

"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:HWLtb.1935$9l2.7642212@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
> "rex" <rexy@ij.net> wrote in message
news:3fb78737_6@corp.newsgroups.com...
> > "Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:wMFtb.31778$Hb3.11180@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com...
> > > "joe" <joebird_11@netzero.com> wrote in message
> > > news:bp6qhi$13sp$1@news.wplus.net...
> > > > yes they could have done the raid in a private school too, had the
> > > principal
> > > > invited them in to do it ( as is the case in the S.C. school) the
> > > difference
> > > > is that in a private school the principal would have to answer to
> angery
> > > > parents.
> > >
> > > Don't public school principals have to answer to parents too? Or at
> least
> > to
> > > the school board, who the parents elected?
> >
> > That is the classic reasoning of totalitarian socialism.  If the issue
is
> > education, food, clothing, shelter, TV, widgets or any goods or
services,
> > then a freedom advocate will point out how people provide for needs in a
> > free market economy, and the response of the classic totalitarian
> socialist
> > is that everything that people have in a free society can be provided by
a
> > totalitarian government because "Don't government providers have to
answer
> > to citizens too? Or at least to the provider board, who the citizens
> elect?"
> > It is frightening how commonplace that response has become and how the
> > people who provide that response to one subject (e.g. schools) NEVER
> OPENLY
> > expand the response as was done in the Union of Soviet Socialist
> Republics,
> > Communist China, the National Socialist German Workers Party, Cuba, etc.
> > It is as if the people who use that simplistic response do not know all
> the
> > horrible ideologies that have used that same response.   Very
frightening.
>
> You proved nothing. School boards answer to citizens. Period. That's
> democracy. In totalitarianism, no citizen has any say. Period.

You proved everything I said. Period.  It is amazing that you responded with
a complete defense of the same cliche reasoning that is used by totalitarian
socialists, even after I directly confront you with the point. Period.
You are a "rubber-stamp statist."  Period. You do not think philosophically
about the range of your own comments, and you simplistically rubber-stamp
government programs that others start (because you are not enough of a
creative thinker to come up with your own socialist ideas).  Point to any
website or even other group posts where you attempt to explain any political
philsophy or philosophy of government that you hold (you hold none, other
than rubber-stamp statism) or point to any philosophical defense of liberty
(calling for the reduction of government programs, laws, socialism) that you
have ever made.  You can point to nothing.  You are a rubber-stamp statist
who uses the cliches of totalitarian socialism.





-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----==  Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----