🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 01:23:28 -0400, Bob LeChevalier
<lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:

>Outta Sight <outamind@there.net> wrote:
>>On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 11:20:15 -0400, Bob LeChevalier
>><lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:
>>>makemyday@worldnet.att.net wrote:
>>>>Friday, October 01, 2004
>>>>************************ exZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZerpt *********************
>>>>PARAMARIBO, Suriname (AP) - Organisers announced Wednesday that 
>>>>non-blacks wouldn't be allowed to participate in some meetings of a
>>>>racism conference, deciding to stick with a policy that overshadowed 
>>>>the gathering two years ago.....
>>>>
>>>>"We want to make sure that the people who will take part in the 
>>>>discussions feel free to talk about the many painful issues....
>>>>********************************************************************
>>>>
>>>>Unlike Bob, the organizerz of this conference feel it'z possible
>>>>to spot a DAFN when you *see* one.
>>>
>>>Nothing in what you quote about how "non-blacks" would be identified.
>>
>>How would you identify "non-blacks" lojbab?  Please relate to us how
>>you know your answer to be factual with one or more provable cites.
>
>I'm not one who claims that they CAN be identified.
>
>lojbab

You also can not answer a direct question. Shall we start over? The
interest is in your abilities (or,perhaps, your inabilities).
 
How would you identify "non-blacks" lojbab?  Please relate to us how
you know your answer to be factual with one or more provable cites.