🚀 go-pugleaf

Outta Sight <outamind@there.net> wrote:
>On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 11:20:15 -0400, Bob LeChevalier
><lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:
>>makemyday@worldnet.att.net wrote:
>>>Friday, October 01, 2004
>>>************************ exZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZerpt *********************
>>>PARAMARIBO, Suriname (AP) - Organisers announced Wednesday that 
>>>non-blacks wouldn't be allowed to participate in some meetings of a
>>>racism conference, deciding to stick with a policy that overshadowed 
>>>the gathering two years ago.....
>>>
>>>"We want to make sure that the people who will take part in the 
>>>discussions feel free to talk about the many painful issues....
>>>********************************************************************
>>>
>>>Unlike Bob, the organizerz of this conference feel it'z possible
>>>to spot a DAFN when you *see* one.
>>
>>Nothing in what you quote about how "non-blacks" would be identified.
>
>How would you identify "non-blacks" lojbab?  Please relate to us how
>you know your answer to be factual with one or more provable cites.

I'm not one who claims that they CAN be identified.

lojbab
-- 
lojbab                                             lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban:                 http://www.lojban.org