🚀 go-pugleaf

Bob LeChevalier wrote:
> 
> gumshoe detective <gumshoes@free.com> wrote:
> >> I've never seen any studies on the correlation of things with
> >> birthday, firstname, and height, not to mention the thousands of other
> >> possible variables which could be used to compare people.
> >
> >What basis do you have to believe there would be any correlation with
> >anything and birthdate?
> >
> >None.
> 
> I have no basis to believe that there would be any correlation with
> race, except that YOU claim it, which is a lousy reason.

Hold on a sec, it'z the DOJ and CDC (gov't agencies) that break out
the crime, incarceration, and OOW_Breeding statz by race.  Why do you
suppose they do that, Bob?  Are they "idiot racist scum" ???  And
how about the NAEP and every school district in the country who
break out all the standardized test score averages, graduation/dropout 
rates, even the enrollment figures, all by race (not by first names and 
height...)

> >We know that race is hereditary.
> 
> Not really.  But so is height.  First names are partially hereditary
> like intelligence - we don't find too many boys named "Sue" outside of
> the song.

Why don't DOJ/CDC/NAEP and school districts break out the stats by 
first name and height?  Huh?  Do you suppose it's because that makes 
no goddam sense whatsoFKGever?   (Except maybe to you, Bob...)

> And only racists see a particular reason to look at race as an
> explanation.
> 
> >It is clearly racial.  Even an idiot can see that.
> 
> Only if they are an idiot racist.

Therefore the DOJ, CDC, NAEP and school districts are idiot racists 
according to Bob.  Or perhaps they only compile the figures so that
"idiot racist scum" will have something to look at...??