🚀 go-pugleaf

Glad Bagz <clear@safe.com> wrote:
>Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in
>news:dafmg09q9q6g2phi2cbo2g77jgv7dd1hsa@4ax.com: 
>>>> >There is just as much reason to look at race as there is for
>>>> >insurance companies to look at the ages of auto liability or life
>>>> >insurance applicants.  Group stats tell a revealing and meaningful
>>>> >story. 
>>>> 
>>>> So tell us the group stats based on birthday, first name, and
>>>> height. Don't have them?  Then why did you pick race as the grouping
>>>> you wish to look at stats for?  
>>>
>>>Because Crime, LowIQ, and OOW_Breeding correlate heavily 
>>>with race, not with birthday, first name, and height.
>> 
>> How do you know?  Have you checked? let's see the data.
>
>You've seen the data many, many times, idiot.

I've never seen any studies on the correlation of things with
birthday, firstname, and height, not to mention the thousands of other
possible variables which could be used to compare people.

In most cases the studies aren't done, and sometimes they miss
important things simply because no one has thought to check (I
recently started taking 1/4 tsp cinnamon a day as an experiment after
reading about a study that had a surprising find, and my triglyceride
level has dropped by a third and my cholesterol by a somewhat smaller
amount, matching the surprising study result.  No one knows why, or
whether there are longer term effects, but at least for the nonce, my
health may be slightly better.
 
>> Why did you check the data for race and NOT checked the data for the
>> other variables?  
>
>There are no other variables which can explain why such things are common 
>in the black race in every country in which they live and at all socio-
>economic levels.

How would you know?  Have you done all possible studies?

>You fools try to introduce other "variables" into the argument to try to 
>distract from the facts.  The problems is that your excuses, which is 
>what they are and not variables, are not logically based,

Logic is that there is no reason why cinnamon should cause my
triglyceride level to drop.  But it does.

>can't be quantified,

How would you know?

>and can never be proven one way or another because they have 
>nothing to do with why black people behave the way they do.

How could you know?

>> Because you are a subhuman racist slime, is why.
>
>Bob, why is black crime disproporationately high from Canada to England 
>to Africa?

I don't know that it is (and I don't care), since "disproportionate"
would have required eliminating all those other variables AND using an
objective definition of "black".

And I'm not a subhuman racist slime like you.

>Bob, why are black people disproportionately reliant on welfare all over 
>the world that offers them welfare?

I don't know that it is (and I don't care), since "disproportionate"
would have required eliminating all those other variables AND using an
objective definition of "black".

And I'm not a subhuman racist slime like you.

>Why is EVERY single black nation on this earth an impoverished shit hole 
>of starvation, disease, and crime?

I don't know that it is so (and I don't care), and answering "why"
would have required eliminating all those other variables AND using an
objective definition of "black".

And I'm not a subhuman racist slime like you.

>Why haven't blacks contributed anything meaningful to the world?  Why is 
>there such a lack of technical innovation coming from black nations?

I don't know that it is so (and I don't care), and answering "why"
would have required eliminating all those other variables AND using an
objective definition of "black" and an objective definition of
"meaningful" and an objective definition of "lack of technical
innovation".

And I'm not a subhuman racist slime like you.

>Low intelligence explains all these things.

So does your being a subhuman racist slime explain all those things,
because only a subhuman racist slime would ask such questions, or care
about the answers.

>Your "variables" do not

You wouldn't know.

>and only obfuscate the truth

"Truth" is for religion and ideology.  My religion is between me and
my God, and I don't pretend to know "truth".  Ideology is something I
think almost as poorly of, as I do subhuman racist slime like you.

>Bob, most people think you are an idiot

You wouldn't know, since you have conducted no studies.

>and most people see right through your lies.

You wouldn't know, since you have conducted no studies (not to mention
the fact that I don't lie).

> Why don't you give it up?

Why don't you stop beating your wife three times daily?

>Nobody argues with the data we present.

Why bother?  It is data gathered by subhuman racist slime, and is
tainted by association with you.

>They just resort to name-calling

No.  That is what subhuman racist slime does when it uses "black" not
to mention other words, as epithets.

>which is all one can do when presented with inarguable truth.

The "only inarguable truth" is that you are a subhuman racist slime.

>Your name is Bob "Usenet's Biggest Idiot" LeChevalier, not lojbab.

Your name is "subhuman racist slime", not "King of SCAA".

>Why 
>don't you get over that stupid fake language and try entering the real 
>world?

Why don't you stop beating your wife three times daily?

lojbab
-- 
lojbab                                             lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban:                 http://www.lojban.org