🚀 go-pugleaf

"Epidemiological studies of mental illness identify 
racism as a major contributor to psychopathology..."

http://www.apa.org/pi/oema/racebib/racismin.html

On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:28:40 GMT, Racist Loser <loser@racistmoron.com> wrote:
 
>disgusting  ...

You sure are: you even attempt to blame your victims.

On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:11:07 GMT, "Comm" <no@spam.com> wrote:

>...self marginalize ...

You do that when you embrace the 
irrationality of racism.

Decent intelligent people support the freedom
of expression of others, while the hate-filled and
irrational racist wishes he could enslave his betters
to antiquated and stagnant forms of speech.

http://www.globalissues.org/HumanRights/Racism.asp

Notice that the hate-filled racist has only weak,
unsubstantiated, and fallacious false accusations,
while those of us who don't share that failure
offer scientific findings to contradict racism.

On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 02:04:14 GMT, "Peter Principle" <petesfeats@CUT IT OUThotmail.com>
wrote:

>...Think you're going 
>to change Rudy's "mind" ...

No, of course not.  He'd need one.

I'm pointing out some interesting details on racists
and why they're undesirables in neighborhoods and
in places of employment, among other things.

You needn't read anything you don't care to read, and
if you need assistance learning how to manage that,
just let me know.

The racist is a potential terrorist in many cases:

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/07/16/1089694567005.html?oneclick=true

The racist is exposed and yet attempts to hide.

His weak, unfounded 'condemnation' of creative
innovation in language betrays him to his betters.

Notice that the racist is unable to discern the
very significant difference between acceptance
with accommodation and encouragement.

The racist is also insufficient intellectually to know
why acceptance and accommodation facilitate the
educational process in important ways.

Those who don't share the impairment of the racist
have the ability to understand that denotations should
reflect usage, not the other way around.

The contempt in which the racist is held is due
entirely to his failure to discern the value in the
dynamic development of language, among so
many other forms of scientific thought.

He is merely irrational with his hysteria.

The racist is pitied, as well as detested, for
his failure to comprehend scientific thought.

The racist proves his intellectual inferiority,
exactly as predicted.

The racist is inferior, thus desperate to pretend
the inferiority would somehow be that of others.

"Language is also routinely used to relegate certain 
ethnic minority groups to the lower social statuses."

http://www.usq.edu.au/opacs/sllt/3/Jones03.html

Thus the racist proves his hate with contempt for
the linguistic progress of diverse groups.

On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 17:39:29 GMT, "Racist Bullshitter" <someguy@ph.con> wrote:

>... self-marginalization ...

You have, indeed, removed your own
credibility, entirely.  You've done that
by failing to comprehend linguistic
and other scientific thought.

http://www.usq.edu.au/opacs/sllt/3/Jones03.html

On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 18:01:32 GMT, "Racist Bullshitter" <someguy@ph.con> wrote:

>... social 
>pathology ...

Thanks for exemplifying it.

People are studying the failures that lead 
to such inappropriate behavior as yours.

Inwardly, you must be convinced of your
inferiority to others.  Outwardly, you make
sure there's no lack of evidence of it.

On Fri, 05 Aug 2005 23:20:41 GMT, "Comm" <no@spam.com> wrote:

>Yes, it is true ...

No, it's not, no matter how desperate you are
to imagine otherwise.

Your error worsens for your failure to learn how
to do better.

On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 20:16:38 GMT, "Comm" <no@spam.com> wrote:

>The ONLY thing that marginalizes blacks today is BLACKS ...

That is not true.

Anti-black racism is still doing significant damage to nonwhites.

You probably starve and kick your dog and then try to accuse
him of meanness when he bites you.

http://www.yubanet.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/6/15896

On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 22:24:13 GMT, Racist Bullshitter <someguy@ph.con> wrote:

>... racist...
>... not qualified ...unethical 
>... comlete [sic] lack of 
>credibility.
>... failure to address the facts is the other big 
>demonstration of ... lack of credibility.

You hadn't noticed that no one had asked about you.

You're already known for what you are.  You are so
impaired that you're a tool for sociopathic puppeteers.

Here's something else that the racist is too impaired
to understand:

http://www.uncp.edu/home/canada/work/allam/1914-/language/slang.htm