Article View: misc.education
Article #2195Re: Sabotage of Our Childrens' Future
From: Herman Rubin
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:33
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:33
42 lines
3283 bytes
3283 bytes
In article <g2crv0p2maf5cqfu91utidkp2oqpi3ps9o@4ax.com>, toto <scarecrow@wicked.witch> wrote: >On 30 Jan 2005 20:43:35 -0500, hrubin@odds.stat.purdue.edu (Herman >Rubin) wrote: >>My son learned the structure of mathematics and some of >>the concepts before first grade, and was at the point >>where he could look for them. My daughter, who is not >>a mathematician and not as bright, age nine, and she did >>not want to learn too much not being done in school. >Interesting admission, Herman. Your dd did not *want* to >learn what you wanted to teach her. Did she learn anyway? >If not, what makes you think the teachers in a school setting >can teach unmotivated average kids what you could not >get your own child who was bright, but not as bright as your >son to learn? She did, and later thanked us for it. If it was taught in a class with her friends, she would not have objected at all; the biggest problem was teaching her phonics, and both my wife and I were determined to do this before she started first grade. When she started first grade, she recognized quickly that the school program, claimed to be phonics, was essentially a farce. This was during the "Dick and Jane" days. BTW, my daughter received a PhD in chemistry, and graduated college with an honors degree in mathematics and chemistry, and was a teaching assistant in both as an undergraduate. Also, the materials I used, which may well have been the best available, were at an unnecessarily high vocabulary level. I am not much as a writer, but I believe that a fairly simple rewriting of my late wife's college text in logic could work for the average child in earlier grades. For one with good reading ability, the present book, with a guide to say what not to cover, will work now. -- This address is for information only. I do not claim that these views are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University. Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University hrubin@stat.purdue.edu Phone: (765)494-6054 FAX: (765)494-0558
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ctlq4h$6df0@odds.stat.purdue.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!news.purdue.edu!not-for-mailReferences:
<DRSY8VDX38378.7868518519@reece.net.au> <lv1jv0p4bv1hbsbm7jip4vai04pl9ipdcu@4ax.com> <ctk2g7$218o@odds.stat.purdue.edu> <g2crv0p2maf5cqfu91utidkp2oqpi3ps9o@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f9e27,ac4b622213af97b X-Google-Thread: 10dad2,ac4b622213af97b X-Google-Thread: fe6ac,ac4b622213af97b X-Google-Thread: 10a942,ac4b622213af97b X-Google-Thread: f824f,ac4b622213af97b X-Google-Attributes: gidf9e27,gid10dad2,gidfe6ac,gid10a942,gidf824f,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!news.purdue.edu!not-for-mail From: hrubin@odds.stat.purdue.edu (Herman Rubin) Newsgroups: misc.education,soc.retirement,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.california,ba.general Subject: Re: Sabotage of Our Childrens' Future Date: 31 Jan 2005 12:33:05 -0500 Organization: Purdue University Statistics Department Lines: 42 Message-ID: <ctlq4h$6df0@odds.stat.purdue.edu> References: <DRSY8VDX38378.7868518519@reece.net.au> <lv1jv0p4bv1hbsbm7jip4vai04pl9ipdcu@4ax.com> <ctk2g7$218o@odds.stat.purdue.edu> <g2crv0p2maf5cqfu91utidkp2oqpi3ps9o@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: odds.stat.purdue.edu X-Trace: mailhub227.itcs.purdue.edu 1107192785 26349 128.210.141.13 (31 Jan 2005 17:33:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@purdue.edu NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:33:05 +0000 (UTC)