🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: misc.education
Article #2195

Re: Sabotage of Our Childrens' Future

#2195
From: Herman Rubin
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:33
42 lines
3283 bytes
In article <g2crv0p2maf5cqfu91utidkp2oqpi3ps9o@4ax.com>,
toto  <scarecrow@wicked.witch> wrote:
>On 30 Jan 2005 20:43:35 -0500, hrubin@odds.stat.purdue.edu (Herman
>Rubin) wrote:

>>My son learned the structure of mathematics and some of
>>the concepts before first grade, and was at the point
>>where he could look for them.  My daughter, who is not
>>a mathematician and not as bright, age nine, and she did
>>not want to learn too much not being done in school.

>Interesting admission, Herman.  Your dd did not *want* to
>learn what you wanted to teach her.  Did she learn anyway?
>If not, what makes you think the teachers in a school setting
>can teach unmotivated average kids what you could not
>get your own child who was bright, but not as bright as your
>son to learn?

She did, and later thanked us for it.  If it was taught in
a class with her friends, she would not have objected at
all; the biggest problem was teaching her phonics, and both
my wife and I were determined to do this before she started
first grade.  When she started first grade, she recognized
quickly that the school program, claimed to be phonics, was
essentially a farce.  This was during the "Dick and Jane" days.

BTW, my daughter received a PhD in chemistry, and graduated
college with an honors degree in mathematics and chemistry,
and was a teaching assistant in both as an undergraduate.

Also, the materials I used,  which may well have been the
best available, were at an unnecessarily high vocabulary
level.   I am not much as a writer, but I believe that a
fairly simple rewriting of my late wife's college text in
logic could work for the average child in earlier grades.
For one with good reading ability, the present book, with
a guide to say what not to cover, will work now.
-- 
This address is for information only.  I do not claim that these views
are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University.
Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University
hrubin@stat.purdue.edu         Phone: (765)494-6054   FAX: (765)494-0558
Technical Details
Message-ID: <ctlq4h$6df0@odds.stat.purdue.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!news.purdue.edu!not-for-mail
References: <DRSY8VDX38378.7868518519@reece.net.au> <lv1jv0p4bv1hbsbm7jip4vai04pl9ipdcu@4ax.com> <ctk2g7$218o@odds.stat.purdue.edu> <g2crv0p2maf5cqfu91utidkp2oqpi3ps9o@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f9e27,ac4b622213af97b
X-Google-Thread: 10dad2,ac4b622213af97b
X-Google-Thread: fe6ac,ac4b622213af97b
X-Google-Thread: 10a942,ac4b622213af97b
X-Google-Thread: f824f,ac4b622213af97b
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9e27,gid10dad2,gidfe6ac,gid10a942,gidf824f,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!news.purdue.edu!not-for-mail
From: hrubin@odds.stat.purdue.edu (Herman Rubin)
Newsgroups: misc.education,soc.retirement,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.california,ba.general
Subject: Re: Sabotage of Our Childrens' Future
Date: 31 Jan 2005 12:33:05 -0500
Organization: Purdue University Statistics Department
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <ctlq4h$6df0@odds.stat.purdue.edu>
References: <DRSY8VDX38378.7868518519@reece.net.au> <lv1jv0p4bv1hbsbm7jip4vai04pl9ipdcu@4ax.com> <ctk2g7$218o@odds.stat.purdue.edu> <g2crv0p2maf5cqfu91utidkp2oqpi3ps9o@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: odds.stat.purdue.edu
X-Trace: mailhub227.itcs.purdue.edu 1107192785 26349 128.210.141.13 (31 Jan 2005 17:33:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@purdue.edu
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:33:05 +0000 (UTC)