🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jan 10, 1:51 pm, Intrepid <Intrepid...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> <
> =========================
>     A MORE SPECIAL REPORT
> =========================
>     NEW YORK, NY (Foxx News)
> --Oprah Winfrey WILL BE Piers
> Morgans" first guest on his new
> prime-time talk show on CNN
> International on Jan.18.
>     CNN had announced that Oprah
> would be replaced by a live debate
> about the existence of God between
> Stephen Hawking and Ed Conrad.
>     However, CNN has returned to
> its original schedule -- the trillionth
> interview of Oprah Winfey -- after
> it received a voice-mail message
> from Hawkins in London an hour
> ago.
>     <http://www.elihu.envy.nu/NeoPics/Sounds/Hawking1.wav
> <
> To the hearing impaired, Steve emphatically admits:
> <
> "In the beginning, God created the heaven and the earth . . ."
> <
>       Apparently, Hawkins became the
> first Super Evoutionist to finally accept
> a Creator and, consequently, there is
> no reason for a debate.
>     He has become Ed Conrad's prize
> convert and Ed is now teaching him,
> how to show his middle finger to the astheists and evolutionists.
>     A CNN spokesman said, in view of
> the fact that Professor Hawking now
> obviously believes in God, a debate
> between him and Ed Conrad "would
> be a total waste of an hour of our
> viewers' valuable time."
> <
> =======================
> <
> DISREGARD THIS EARLIER BULLETIN
> <
> ========================
>         SPECIAL REPORT
> =======================
> <
>    NEW YORK, NY (Foxx News)
>  -- Multi award-winning talk-show
> host Oprah Winfrey will NOT be
> Piers Morgan’s first guest on
> his new primetime show on CNN
> International on Tuesday, Jan. 18.
>     Instead, a CNN spokesman said,
> the first show will feature a live debate
> about the existence of God between
> Stephen Hawking and Ed Conrad.
>      Oprah will be a guest the following
> night or probably the following week,
> if ever.
>       Hawking and Conrad have been
> itching for this debate for decades
> and surely will let it all hang out.
>        Pseudscientists everywhere,
> incuding those at the Smithsonian,
> are sure Hawking, the famed astro-
> pysicist who has the highest IQ of
> anyone in the known universe, will
> clean Ed's clock -- but others aren't
> so confident.
>        To make sure there's an even
> playng field, Conrad -- perhaps the
> most hated person on the face of
> the earth -- said he will enter the
> debate with one hand tied behind
> his back and wearing a patch over
> one eye.
> <
>      MORE    MORE   MORE
> <http://www.edconrad.orghttp://www.edconrad.com
> <
> =====================
> <
Perhaps the Ed Conrad “man of coal” is the missing link.

Try to imagine a kg mosquito thawed out from one of those dino era ice
ages or excavated from a layer of coal, or perhaps a few exoskeleton
bugs that you could put a saddle on.  Naked goldilocks humans would
have been extremely low on the food chain, and relatively easy
pickings considering how much bigger and nastier most everything else
was.

Many, many times before it was the end of the world, as well as in
between ice-ages it was far less than ideal.  This time we seem to be
getting ourselves cooked alive and/or snowed under as well as storm
and flood traumatized.  The good news is that Greenland is floating
upwards faster than oceans are rising, and every year there’s
considerable new land available that isn’t continually iced over.

China has been extensively cruising all over this world long before
anyone else, and those expansive ice shelfs are not exactly impossible
to walk on or to otherwise pull sleds and portable yurts along, not to
mention all the extra dry land made available in each mid ice age with
so much being iced up.  So therefore ice-age migrations of humans
seems perfectly doable, especially if you were looking for either
higher ground or better caves that were above or out of the way of
whatever seasonal floodplain of gauntlet flows of glacial ice and
dammed up water that had no safe place to go, other than through your
cave.

Most of intelligent humans only got themselves ahead of the other
99.9% of the highly competitive local biodiversity after the end of
the last ice age that terminated relatively hard as of 11,712 years
ago, and ever since we've been thawing out like never before (almost
as though we previously didn’t have a moon or nearly as much seasonal
tilt or slow tidal induced wobble before).

Apparently the furless naked Goldilocks human species (especially
those of us that weren’t of those fury and smelly big-foots) didn't do
so well in snow or ice, or while being chased by those pesky floods
that took everything out in their paths.  If it wasn't one thing it
was another and another that made surviving on our Eden/Earth
downright testy, if not insurmountable to say the least.  God’s
original people (mostly black dudes and their Aunt Jemima gals)
certainly had their survival work cut out for themselves.  If they
were Jewish they would have had servitudes and slaves, as well as
having false flag wars and crucifictions, so at least we know that
wasn’t the case (perhaps they hadn't invented hording, greed, insider
trading, mafia cabal like market speculating, body organ snatchings,
Madoff Ponzi corruption or need to commit treasonous or murderous
acts).

According to our physically dark moon, Earth got summarily nailed by
those 10+ km asteroids a good 100+ times if not a thousand times over,
and each one of those events would have nearly wiped out the global
diversity of that era.  Whatever made that lunar south pole crater/
dent of 2500 km diameter and busting 3e18 tonnes lose (similar to the
encounter needed for creating the Arctic ocean basin) would have been
yet another biodiversity wipeout for humanity and most of everything
else, even if that horrific primary impactor never touched us because
of all the secondary moon debris gauntlet of hundreds or nearly a
thousand 10 km impactors all by itself would have been more than
sufficient doom.  In other words, it would have been raining those 10
km moon basalt rocks plus loads of smaller items on us for months and
even years on end, and no place on Earth would have been safe.

Our second moon “3753 Cruithne” of roughly 5 km could have been a
lithobraking established orbit, as a part of something much bigger
which smacked into us at a sufficiently low angle and kept right on
going.  Could have been from a really big rear-ender sucker-punch that
lost one of its nuts.

According to somewhat recent astronomy and astrophysics research, the
majority if not most of the moons in our solar system were captured,
as in not having been created on the fly or created from secondary
debris after big encounters.  This means that our moon was unlikely
created from matter forced out of Earth, as all K12 and higher
education textbooks as well as mainstream media insist, and if a moon
can be captured, then so can a planet.  Perhaps now we have a whole
new ballgame that’ll start making sense.

 ~ BG