Article View: misc.education
Article #835Survey on methods of evaluation.
From: Mulhem Philippe
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 08:37
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 08:37
188 lines
7714 bytes
7714 bytes
Grenoble, the 8th January 1993
Dear colleagues,
As an integral part of our university teaching training, we are
conducting a survey of the ways by which students are evaluated at various
educational centers around the world.
The results of this survey will be presented in June 1993 at the university
of Grenoble.
1- The goal of this survey
The goal of this survey is to examine the various methods of evaluation
used in different countries. This survey does not focus on a particular
domain but it is nevertheless more concerned with courses taken place during
the first or second year of university study. (One course per questionnaire.)
This survey can be completed by either teachers or students.
2- The content of this survey
The questionnaire is comprised of four main sections. The first three
sections involve a set of questions with predefined answers, i.e. the
different types of answers have the format:
choice [ ]: to be marked by 'X' for a positive answer
( ) : to be filled by the answer (optional answer).
The first section is concerned with the level of the chosen course.
The second section is concerned with the chosen course itself.
The third section is concerned with the marking system of the chosen
course.
The last section is an open one, in which you may wish to make further
comments.
3- Please send the completed questionnaire either:
- by mail: Mulhem Philippe
Laboratoire de Genie Informatique - Institut IMAG- Bat. B
BP 53 x, 38041 Grenoble Cedex - FRANCE -
- or by e-mail: mulhem@imag.fr
You are welcome to distribute this questionnaire to your colleagues.
Thank you in advance for participating in this study,
The group conducting the survey:
Sandrine Balbo
Olivier Isnard
Philippe Mulhem
Laurence Nigay
Jean-Christophe Roux
Pierre Wodey
////////////////////// The Questionnaire ////////////////////////////////
SURVEY: "ASSESSMENT AND GRADING"
E-mail or postal address (optional, to receive the results of the survey):
.................................................
Country: ........................................
University or Institute: ........................
Status of the University: [ ] private [ ] public or state
Position: [ ] teaching [ ] student
LEVEL OF THE COURSE
-------------------
Degree title (Bachelor, License etc.): .......................
Pedagogic aim: [ ] Technical and/or [ ] Theoretical
Length of time: [ ] 6 months [ ] 12 months Other: ( )months
THE COURSE
----------
Subject taught: ..................
University year:1st [ ] 2nd [ ] Other: ( )
Teaching Context
----------------
Type of Teaching:
R=Recitations E=Experiments L=Lectures P=Projects O=Other*
Type of teaching: R[] E[] L[] P[] O[]
Number of students: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Number of hours: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Length of time (months): ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
* If other, please describe: .....................................
HOW ARE STUDENTS EVALUATED IN THIS COURSE
-----------------------------------------
Assessment: HOW?
----------------
Please choose the type(s) of teaching (See "Teaching Context" section)
that you will describe.
(For example: Assess.1 Assess.2 )
( Type(s) of teaching: Recitations Lectures )
Assess.1 Assess.2 Assess.3 Assess.4
Type(s) of teaching: ........ ........ ........ ........
How:
Oral : Talk [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Interview [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Written [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Question/Answer [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Experiments [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Other* [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Examination:
Frequency (ex: 1/month) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Total number ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Average length of time ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Mandatory [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Optional [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Mark:
Letter [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Number [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Opinion (ex: Good, Bad, etc.) [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Other** [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
* If other, please describe: .......................................
** If other, please describe: .......................................
Marking system
-------------- Max Min
Letter ( ) ( )
Number ( ) ( )
Other** ( ) ( )
Are attendance and/or participation during classes taken into account?
[ ] yes [ ] no
If yes, how? .........................................................
Assessment: OF WHAT?
--------------------
Assess.1 Assess.2 Assess.3 Assess.4
Assessment: Knowledge [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Understanding [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Assimilation [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Other* [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
* If other, please describe: ........................................
Further remarks:
Assessment: WHY?
----------------
Assess.1 Assess.2 Assess.3 Assess.4
Diploma [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Class list (in order of merit) [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Validation of a standard [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Exam preparation [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Mid-term [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Other* [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
* If other, please describe: ........................................
FURTHER COMMENTS:
-----------------
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
--
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
MULHEM Philippe | LGI-IMAG Campus B205 Bp 53X | Tel (33) 76-51-46-29
mulhem@imag.imag.fr | 38041 GRENOBLE Cedex (France) | Fax (33) 76-44-66-75
_- -_
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C1I7z9.DnE@imag.fr>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!sgiblab!darwin.sura.net!newsserver.jvnc.net!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!math.fu-berlin.de!news.netmbx.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!julienas!babbage!isis!mulhemShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: misc.education Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!sgiblab!darwin.sura.net!newsserver.jvnc.net!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!math.fu-berlin.de!news.netmbx.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!julienas!babbage!isis!mulhem From: mulhem@imag.fr (Mulhem Philippe) Subject: Survey on methods of evaluation. Message-ID: <C1I7z9.DnE@imag.fr> Organization: IMAG Institute, University of Grenoble, France Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 08:37:57 GMT Lines: 188