🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <94focd$ck4$1@bob.news.rcn.net>,
  "Coleman E. Howard" <cehoward@erols.com> wrote:
>
> Nomad in Starkhafn <nomadSPAMMENOTsca@aol.com> wrote in message > The thing
> is, if the officers had all been honest they probably would
> > have gotten a conviction it sounds like. Instead they attempted to
> > embellish it so they could try to get the guy the harshest punishment
> > they could. And of course, if you get caught in one lie or
> > contradictory statement it tends to make ALL your statements suspect.
> > Those officers that lied and/or embellished their statements are more
> > responsible for that not guilty verdict than anyone else. How does it
> > feel to know that you guys are responsible for that guy going free?
> >
> >
> > Nomad/Michael
> > Las Vegas, NV
> > Barony of Starkhafn, Kingdom of Caid
>
> ------------
>
> IMO, your explanation is right on the button. And if I might add, this is
> almost like the OJ Simpson trial. Mark Furhman, in his biased attempt to
> ADD to the evidence, jeopardized the whole trail. Whereas, if they had just
> told the truth, instead of embellishing it, IMO, both these people, who IMO,
> were guilty, would have been found guilty.
>
> On the other hand, the two-bit-racists don't want to hear your explanation.
> They
> are not going to say the police lied, of if they do, they CONDONE police
> lying.
>
> Again, good post and points well stated.
>
> Coleman(the real one)(check the header)
>
> They,they,they? Who are they?
                   Sgt. Doe


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/